These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12136389)

  • 1. Selective attention to pain: a psychophysical investigation.
    Spence C; Bentley DE; Phillips N; McGlone FP; Jones AK
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Aug; 145(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 12136389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shared attentional resources for processing visual and chemosensory information.
    Spence C; Kettenmann B; Kobal G; McGlone FP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):775-83. PubMed ID: 11548034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective attention to the chemosensory modality.
    Spence C; Kettenmann B; Kobal G; McGlone FP
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Aug; 62(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 11019622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impaired disengagement from threatening cues of impending pain in a crossmodal cueing paradigm.
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Eccleston C; Goubert L
    Eur J Pain; 2004 Jun; 8(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 15109973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Prior entry' for pain: attention speeds the perceptual processing of painful stimuli.
    Zampini M; Bird KS; Bentley DE; Watson A; Barrett G; Jones AK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 17197082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention to olfaction. A psychophysical investigation.
    Spence C; McGlone FP; Kettenmann B; Kobal G
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jun; 138(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 11465740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transient covert attention and the perceived rate of flicker.
    Montagna B; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2006 Aug; 6(9):955-65. PubMed ID: 17083287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain activity during auditory and visual phonological, spatial and simple discrimination tasks.
    Salo E; Rinne T; Salonen O; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 1496():55-69. PubMed ID: 23261663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.
    Helbig HB; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):21.1-16. PubMed ID: 18318624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pain additivity, diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, and attention: a functional measurement analysis.
    Lautenbacher S; Prager M; Rollman GB
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2007 Dec; 24(4):189-201. PubMed ID: 18097992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
    van der Lubbe RH; Havik MM; Bekker EM; Postma A
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of distraction versus spatial discrimination on laser-evoked potentials in migraine.
    de Tommaso M; Baumgartner U; Sardaro M; Difruscolo O; Serpino C; Treede RD
    Headache; 2008 Mar; 48(3):408-16. PubMed ID: 18302701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality.
    Spence C; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Apr; 59(3):389-403. PubMed ID: 9136269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.