117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12137022)
1. The effect of a metal hip prosthesis on the radiation dose in therapeutic photon beam irradiations.
Lin SY; Chu TC; Lin JP; Liu MT
Appl Radiat Isot; 2002 Jul; 57(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 12137022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the accuracy of various dose calculation algorithms of a commercial treatment planning system in the presence of hip prosthesis and comparison with Monte Carlo.
Mohammadi K; Hassani M; Ghorbani M; Farhood B; Knaup C
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(3):501-509. PubMed ID: 28862217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-density dental implants and radiotherapy planning: evaluation of effects on dose distribution using pencil beam convolution algorithm and Monte Carlo method.
Çatli S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):46–52. PubMed ID: 26699323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose attenuation effect of hip prostheses in a 9-MV photon beam: commercial treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo calculations.
Mesbahi A; Nejad FS
Radiat Med; 2007 Dec; 25(10):529-35. PubMed ID: 18085404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the effect of dental implant materials with different densities on radiotherapy dose distribution using Monte-Carlo simulation and pencil beam convolution algorithm.
Akyol O; Dirican B; Toklu T; Eren H; Olgar T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 May; 48(4):20180267. PubMed ID: 30663343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Monte Carlo evaluation of dose distribution of commercial treatment planning systems in heterogeneous media.
Hasani M; Mohammadi K; Ghorbani M; Gholami S; Knaup C
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019 Mar; 15(Supplement):S127-S134. PubMed ID: 30900634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Monte Carlo study on electron and neutron contamination caused by the presence of hip prosthesis in photon mode of a 15 MV Siemens PRIMUS linac.
Bahreyni Toossi MT; Behmadi M; Ghorbani M; Gholamhosseinian H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):52-67. PubMed ID: 24036859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Final Aperture Superposition Technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves.
Faddegon BA; Villarreal-Barajas JE
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3286-94. PubMed ID: 16370417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of an analytic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for high-density inhomogeneities.
Lloyd SA; Ansbacher W
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011707. PubMed ID: 23298077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations.
Martens C; Reynaert N; De Wagter C; Nilsson P; Coghe M; Palmans H; Thierens H; De Neve W
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1528-35. PubMed ID: 12148735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and commissioning of a Monte Carlo photon beam model for the forthcoming clinical trials in microbeam radiation therapy.
Martínez-Rovira I; Sempau J; Prezado Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):119-31. PubMed ID: 22225281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking analytical calculations of proton doses in heterogeneous matter.
Ciangaru G; Polf JC; Bues M; Smith AR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3511-23. PubMed ID: 16475750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental and Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse treatment planning system for effects on dose distribution of the hip prostheses.
Catlı S; Tanır G
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 23910447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiotherapy dose calculations in the presence of hip prostheses.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 12804709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
