BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12137660)

  • 1. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
    Forbes C; Jepson R; Martin-Hirsch P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (3):CD002834. PubMed ID: 12137660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
    Everett T; Bryant A; Griffin MF; Martin-Hirsch PP; Forbes CA; Jepson RG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 May; 2011(5):CD002834. PubMed ID: 21563135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials examining the effectiveness of breast and cervical cancer screening interventions for ethnic minority women.
    Chan DN; So WK
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2015 Oct; 19(5):536-53. PubMed ID: 25840817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake amongst young women: a systematic review.
    Albrow R; Blomberg K; Kitchener H; Brabin L; Patnick J; Tishelman C; Törnberg S; Sparén P; Widmark C
    Acta Oncol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 24660768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
    Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.
    Edwards AG; Evans R; Dundon J; Haigh S; Hood K; Elwyn GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Oct; (4):CD001865. PubMed ID: 17054144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review.
    Jepson RG; Forbes CA; Sowden AJ; Lewis RA
    Health Expect; 2001 Jun; 4(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 11359542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs.
    Edwards A; Unigwe S; Elwyn G; Hood K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD001865. PubMed ID: 12535419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake.
    Agide FD; Garmaroudi G; Sadeghi R; Shakibazadeh E; Yaseri M; Koricha ZB; Tigabu BM
    Eur J Public Health; 2018 Dec; 28(6):1156-1162. PubMed ID: 30346504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interventions to improve the uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: A systematic review.
    Rees I; Jones D; Chen H; Macleod U
    Prev Med; 2018 Jun; 111():323-335. PubMed ID: 29203349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.
    Merry S; McDowell H; Hetrick S; Bir J; Muller N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD003380. PubMed ID: 14974014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
    Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
    Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical review of the literature on the uptake of cervical and breast screening in British South Asian women.
    Sokal R
    Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(4):251-61. PubMed ID: 20836941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multimedia educational interventions for consumers about prescribed and over-the-counter medications.
    Ciciriello S; Johnston RV; Osborne RH; Wicks I; deKroo T; Clerehan R; O'Neill C; Buchbinder R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD008416. PubMed ID: 23633355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    O'Connor AM; Bennett CL; Stacey D; Barry M; Col NF; Eden KB; Entwistle VA; Fiset V; Holmes-Rovner M; Khangura S; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Rovner D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jul; (3):CD001431. PubMed ID: 19588325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Educational Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Rural Populations: A Systematic Review.
    Zhang M; Sit JWH; Chan DNS; Akingbade O; Chan CWH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.