These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12138788)

  • 1. Day to day use and service-related issues with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Entific Medical Systems questionnaire.
    Dutt SN; McDermott AL; Jelbert A; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):20-8. PubMed ID: 12138788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone-anchored hearing aids are effective and associated with a high degree of satisfaction.
    Gardell IS; Andresen K; Faber CE; Wanscher JH
    Dan Med J; 2015 Jul; 62(7):. PubMed ID: 26183047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient satisfaction and functional results with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA).
    Saroul N; Gilain L; Montalban A; Giraudet F; Avan P; Mom T
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2011 Jun; 128(3):107-13. PubMed ID: 21601551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: surgical methods and complications.
    Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1996; 21():7-12. PubMed ID: 9015443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience.
    Badran K; Bunstone D; Arya AK; Suryanarayanan R; Mackinnon N
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 16868513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Audiological effect of bone-anchored hearing aid].
    Kondoh K; Matsushiro N; Satoh T; Kuramasu T; Kubo T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2005 Dec; 108(12):1144-51. PubMed ID: 16440811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An intra-individual comparison of the previous conventional hearing aid with the bone-anchored hearing aid: The Nijmegen group questionnaire.
    McDermott AL; Dutt SN; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):15-9. PubMed ID: 12138786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid: patient satisfaction with the Cordelle device.
    Ho EC; Monksfield P; Egan E; Reid A; Proops D
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 19623095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disability, handicap and benefit analysis with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Glasgow hearing aid benefit and difference profiles.
    McDermott AL; Dutt SN; Tziambazis E; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):29-36. PubMed ID: 12138789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients' opinions of bone-anchored vs conventional hearing aids.
    Mylanus EA; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Apr; 121(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 7702816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients.
    Lustig LR; Arts HA; Brackmann DE; Francis HF; Molony T; Megerian CA; Moore GF; Moore KM; Morrow T; Potsic W; Rubenstein JT; Srireddy S; Syms CA; Takahashi G; Vernick D; Wackym PA; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 May; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 11347635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Efficacy in patients with outer and middle ear deformities of using bone-anchored hearing aids].
    FAN Y; CHEN XW; YANG H; ZHANG ZY; ZHU XL; CAO KL; GAO ZQ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22800340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: paediatric experience and results.
    Powell RH; Burrell SP; Cooper HR; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1996; 21():21-9. PubMed ID: 9015445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.
    Wazen JJ; Caruso M; Tjellstrom A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech intelligibility with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience.
    Dutt SN; McDermott AL; Burrell SP; Cooper HR; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):47-51. PubMed ID: 12138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues.
    Dutt SN; McDermott AL; Jelbert A; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):7-14. PubMed ID: 12138792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term benefit and sound localization in patients with single-sided deafness rehabilitated with an osseointegrated bone-conduction device.
    Saroul N; Akkari M; Pavier Y; Gilain L; Mom T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 23202156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM).
    Macnamara M; Phillips D; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1996; 21():38-40. PubMed ID: 9015447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.