287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12138969)
1. Requiem for reuse of single-use and reusable devices?
Daschner F
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):356; author reply 357. PubMed ID: 12138969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. If it is reusable, why not reuse it?
Belkin NL
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):357-8. PubMed ID: 12138970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reprocessed single-use devices--safe or not?
Nelson R
Am J Nurs; 2006 Apr; 106(4):25-6. PubMed ID: 16575231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The reuse of single-use devices: the story continues...
Campbell S
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2001; 35(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 11668947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospitals' reused tools: reassessing the risk to you.
Hawkins D
US News World Rep; 1999 Nov; 127(21):74. PubMed ID: 10724808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reusing medical devices. Ensuring safety the second time around.
Lewis C
FDA Consum; 2000; 34(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 11590804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reuse of disposable medical products.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1996 Oct; 10(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10162038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Agencies seek discussion about reuse. No silence, please!
Mater Manag Health Care; 1997 May; 6(5):38. PubMed ID: 10167494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Eyeing the reprocessors. Makers of disposable devices push for controls on reuse.
Hensley S
Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(38):64. PubMed ID: 10170402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Requiem for reuse of single-use devices in US hospitals.
Favero MS
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):539-41. PubMed ID: 11732781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New FDA regulation on reprocessing single-use devices. How it may affect U.S. hospitals.
Health Devices; 2000 May; 29(5):185-7. PubMed ID: 10851652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before.
Hawkins D
US News World Rep; 1999 Sep; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Single minded.
Bothamley C
Nurs Stand; 2000 Jun 7-13; 14(38):24. PubMed ID: 11974286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reusable versus single-use laparoscopy instruments: who is responsible for patient safety?
Cahill NE
Minim Invasive Surg Nurs; 1994; 8(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 7812384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. FDA taking disposable reuse out of the closet.
DeJohn P
Hosp Mater Manage; 2000 Mar; 25(3):1, 9-10. PubMed ID: 10977511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Debate on reuse of "disposable" medical equipment fueled by FDA.
Gibson NK
J Clin Monit Comput; 1998 Jan; 14(1):75. PubMed ID: 9641860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reuse of single-use medical devices.
Fielder JH
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(6):80-1. PubMed ID: 10576078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Re-using 'single-use' medical devices.
Coates J; Grierson S
N Z Med J; 2000 Sep; 113(1117):384-5. PubMed ID: 11050906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]