These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12139089)

  • 1. An empirical comparison of discrete ratings and subjective probability ratings.
    Berbaum KS; Dorfman DD; Franken EA; Caldwell RT
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 12139089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: Effects on ROC analysis.
    Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 17178364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
    Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.
    Gur D; Bandos AI; King JL; Klym AH; Cohen CS; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Perrin RL; Poller WR; Shah R; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Rockette HE
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4404-9. PubMed ID: 18975686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 10845403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
    Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ROC Curve for Extremely Subtle Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs Confirmed by CT Scan.
    Shang H; Jiang Y; Li F; MacMahon H; Wang J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26774737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?
    Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Hakim CM; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Sumkin JH
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20236840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques.
    Rockette HE; Gur D; Metz CE
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Feb; 27(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 1601610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.
    Chakraborty DP
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3463-82. PubMed ID: 16825743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part I. Some interesting examples of binormal degeneracy.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Brandser EA
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):420-6. PubMed ID: 10845401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proper ROC analysis and joint ROC analysis of the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiology.
    Berbaum KS; Dorfman DD; Franken EA; Caldwell RT
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Nov; 7(11):945-58. PubMed ID: 11089697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the shape of the population ROC curve.
    Jiang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):897-907. PubMed ID: 23664003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applicability of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis on discrete caries depth ratings.
    Verdonschot EH; Wenzel A; Bronkhorst EM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 8222599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple classification and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
    Steinbach WR; Richter K
    Med Decis Making; 1987; 7(4):234-7. PubMed ID: 3683110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of lung cancer on radiographs: receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists', pulmonologists', and anesthesiologists' performance.
    Monnier-Cholley L; Carrat F; Cholley BP; Tubiana JM; Arrivé L
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 15486213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 10845402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
    Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Lenth RV; Chen YF; Donaghy BA
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):591-602. PubMed ID: 9750888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.