These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12139101)

  • 1. Effects of intrathecal injection of diatrizoate on dopamine receptors.
    Lasser EC; Lamkin GE
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):826-9. PubMed ID: 12139101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inadvertent intrathecal use of ionic contrast media for myelography.
    Bøhn HP; Reich L; Suljaga-Petchel K
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1992; 13(6):1515-9. PubMed ID: 1442425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of high-performance liquid chromatography in the characterization of iatrogenic sodium diatrizoate-induced seizures in a horse.
    Fitzgerald SD; Braselton WE
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 2004 Sep; 16(5):473-5. PubMed ID: 15460337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peritoneal reaction resulting from iodinated contrast material: comparative study.
    Eisenberg AD; Winfield AC; Page DL; Holburn GE; Schifter T; Segars JH
    Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):149-51. PubMed ID: 2544920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intravenous injection of ioxilan, iohexol and diatrizoate. Effects on urine profiles in the rat.
    Thomsen HS; Dorph S; Mygind T; Sovak M; Nielsen H; Rygaard H; Larsen S; Skaarup P; Hemmingsen L; Holm J
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 2964835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do contrast media aggravate Fanconi's syndrome in rats? A comparison of diatrizoate, iohexol, and ioxilan.
    Thomsen HS; Dorph S; Mygind T; Nielsen H; Rygaard H; Larsen S; Skaarup P; Hemmingsen L; Holm J
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S164-7. PubMed ID: 3198337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glucose alters the susceptibility of mesangial cells to contrast media.
    Wasaki M; Sugimoto J; Shirota K
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Jul; 36(7):355-62. PubMed ID: 11496090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iohexol compared with diatrizoate in pediatric urography.
    Jorulf H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():42-5. PubMed ID: 6591740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidence of fibrillation with dilute contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Ventura J
    Invest Radiol; 1986 May; 21(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 3519525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iohexol vs. diatrizoate. A comparative study in intravenous urography.
    Rankin RN; Eng FW
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S112-4. PubMed ID: 3972525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of hepatic damage from direct injections of iodinated contrast agents and carbon dioxide.
    Culp WC; Mladinich CR; Hawkins IF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Oct; 10(9):1265-70. PubMed ID: 10527206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gadopentetate dimeglumine and iodinated contrast media. Hemodynamic side effects after bolus injections in pigs.
    Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Ehrhardt K; Köhnlein S; Radtke W; Heintzen P
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Feb; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 9039584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats.
    Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC
    Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurotoxicity of iohexol: a new nonionic contrast medium.
    Bryan RN; Centeno RS; Hershkowitz N; Poelstra RJ; Osato MS
    Radiology; 1982 Nov; 145(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 7134441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doses of contrast media.
    Davies P
    Lancet; 1978 Mar; 1(8063):556-7. PubMed ID: 76097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
    Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Liposomes carrying diatrizoate. Characterization of biophysical properties and imaging applications.
    Seltzer SE; Davis MA; Adams DF; Shulkin PM; Landis WJ; Havron A
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 6533105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
    Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.