These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12139912)

  • 21. Supplementing breast-fed babies in the UK to protect their mothers from tiredness or distress.
    Cloherty M; Alexander J; Holloway I
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 15177864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care.
    Harvey S; Rach D; Stainton MC; Jarrell J; Brant R
    Midwifery; 2002 Dec; 18(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 12473441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Women's satisfaction with midwife-led continuity of care: an observational study in Palestine.
    Mortensen B; Diep LM; Lukasse M; Lieng M; Dwekat I; Elias D; Fosse E
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e030324. PubMed ID: 31685501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Continuity of carer: what matters to women? A review of the evidence.
    Green JM; Renfrew MJ; Curtis PA
    Midwifery; 2000 Sep; 16(3):186-96. PubMed ID: 10970752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. It does matter where you come from: mothers' experiences of childbirth in midwife obstetric units, Tshwane, South Africa.
    Oosthuizen SJ; Bergh AM; Pattinson RC; Grimbeek J
    Reprod Health; 2017 Nov; 14(1):151. PubMed ID: 29145897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and views of extending their role to the examination of the newborn baby.
    Rogers C; Bloomfield L; Townsend J
    Midwifery; 2003 Mar; 19(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 12634037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Innovative Postpartum Care Model for Mother-Baby Dyads.
    Laliberté C; Dunn S; Pound C; Sourial N; Yasseen AS; Millar D; Rennicks White R; Walker M; Lacaze-Masmonteil T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148520. PubMed ID: 26871448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Culture, control and the birth environment.
    Newburn M
    Pract Midwife; 2003 Sep; 6(8):20-5. PubMed ID: 14533268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Midwifery one-to-one support in labour: More than a ratio.
    Sosa GA; Crozier KE; Stockl A
    Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():230-239. PubMed ID: 29727828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploring the qualities of midwifery-led continuity of care in Australia (MiLCCA) using the quality maternal and newborn care framework.
    Cummins A; Coddington R; Fox D; Symon A
    Women Birth; 2020 Mar; 33(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 30987800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part II: women's satisfaction.
    Fereday J; Collins C; Turnbull D; Pincombe J; Oster C
    Women Birth; 2009 Mar; 22(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 18926788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Change over time in women's views and experiences of maternity care in England, 1995-2014: A comparison using survey data.
    Henderson J; Redshaw M
    Midwifery; 2017 Jan; 44():35-40. PubMed ID: 27889681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of data obtained from service providers and service users to assess the quality of maternity care.
    Hundley V; Penney G; Fitzmaurice A; van Teijlingen E; Graham W
    Midwifery; 2002 Jun; 18(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 12139910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experience with and amount of postpartum maternity care: Comparing women who rated the care they received from the maternity care assistant as 'good' or 'less than good care'.
    Baas CI; Wiegers TA; de Cock TP; Erwich JJHM; Spelten ER; Hutton EK
    Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():128-136. PubMed ID: 29024880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breastfeeding in Bristol: teaching good positioning, and support from fathers and families.
    Ingram J; Johnson D; Greenwood R
    Midwifery; 2002 Jun; 18(2):87-101. PubMed ID: 12139907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Promoting successful breast feeding among women with a low income.
    Whelan A; Lupton P
    Midwifery; 1998 Jun; 14(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 10382477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The motivation and capacity to go 'above and beyond': Qualitative analysis of free-text survey responses in the M@NGO randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery.
    Allen J; Kildea S; Hartz DL; Tracy M; Tracy S
    Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():148-156. PubMed ID: 28458123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Postnatal depression: use of health services and satisfaction with health-care providers.
    Webster J; Pritchard MA; Linnane JW; Roberts JA; Hinson JK; Starrenburg SE
    J Qual Clin Pract; 2001 Dec; 21(4):144-8. PubMed ID: 11856412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Who is holding the baby? Women's experiences of contact with their baby immediately after birth: An Australian population-based survey.
    Biro MA; Yelland JS; Brown SJ
    Women Birth; 2015 Dec; 28(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 26037455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can a midwife-led continuity model improve maternal services in a low-resource setting? A non-randomised cluster intervention study in Palestine.
    Mortensen B; Lukasse M; Diep LM; Lieng M; Abu-Awad A; Suleiman M; Fosse E
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e019568. PubMed ID: 29567846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.