130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12141053)
1. Evolution: CIOs seeking smaller, mobile hardware.
Gillespie G
Health Data Manag; 2002 Jul; 10(7):42-7. PubMed ID: 12141053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Light pens & touch screens & voice, oh my!
Healthc Inform; 1992 Aug; 9(8):46-9. PubMed ID: 10121051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. User interfaces: where the rubber meets the road.
Laughlin ML
Comput Healthc; 1993 Feb; 14(2):16-8, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10123538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hardware strategies: what to expect in the next year.
Richmond D; McAllistor K; Rebh R; Shire W; Holmes B; Cotshott G; Hasselblad G; Marks K
Healthc Inform; 1992 Jan; 9(1):24-5, 28. PubMed ID: 10120908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Information systems management under pressure.
Klynstra JH
Psychiatr Hosp; 1992; 23(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10116648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient care automation: the future is now. Part 5. The role of technology.
Korpman RA
Nurs Econ; 1991; 9(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1996157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An eye single to the patient. Interview by Carolyn Dunbar.
Korpman R
Comput Healthc; 1991 Oct; 12(10):30-2. PubMed ID: 10115967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in computer hardware and software.
Frankenfeld FM
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Apr; 50(4):707-11. PubMed ID: 8470690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HBO to develop patient-care software.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 1991 Sep; 21(36):26. PubMed ID: 10112629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Physicians who use the system help hospitals gain advantage.
Schreier J
Comput Healthc; 1991 Aug; 12(8):30-1, 33. PubMed ID: 10112538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond benchmarks: assuring hardware performance.
Walker L
Healthc Inform; 1993 Feb; 10(2):36, 38. PubMed ID: 10124100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Apple founder targets healthcare as NeXT market. Interview by Carolyn Dunbar and Michael L. Laughlin.
Jobs S
Comput Healthc; 1992 Dec; 13(13):22-3, 25. PubMed ID: 10122905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A tool for software and hardware evaluation.
Kokol P
J Med Syst; 1996 Jun; 20(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 8798948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selecting and implementing a computerized severity of illness system.
Grzybowski DM
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1991 Jul; 62(7):41-6. PubMed ID: 10111553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Software upgrade can end with hard landing.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 1991 Dec; 21(48):48-9. PubMed ID: 10115261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical connection. Hospitals work to design information systems that physicians will use.
Lumsdon K
Hospitals; 1993 May; 67(9):16. PubMed ID: 8477983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Laying a foundation for future information systems.
Toole JE; Caine ME
Top Health Care Financ; 1987; 14(2):17-27. PubMed ID: 3424364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The millenium switch on 01 January 2000--a foreseeable crash for gynecologic and obstetrical software applications?].
Merten R; Vogelbruch M; Seufert R; Lellé RJ
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1998; 120(10):521-3. PubMed ID: 9823655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The integration of existing specialized clinical information systems into a computer-based patient record.
Currie RA; Stevens DP
J AHIMA; 1993 Sep; 64(9):60, 62-3. PubMed ID: 10128939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician use of the TDS system.
Kludt JR
MD Comput; 1995; 12(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 7700129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
