These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12141216)

  • 1. Canadian governance of health research involving human subjects: is anybody minding the store?
    McDonald M
    Health Law J; 2001; 9():1-21. PubMed ID: 12141216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Medical Research Council's new guidelines on research involving human subjects: too much law, too little ethics.
    Hoffmaster B
    Health Law Can; 1989; 10(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 10313310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vulnerable subjects and Canadian research governance.
    Wilson M
    IRB; 2005; 27(6):9-11. PubMed ID: 16425479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A welcome guide for evaluating medical research involving human subjects].
    Borst-Eilers E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 May; 147(19):898-900. PubMed ID: 12768802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research ethics committee: getting started.
    Macpherson CC
    West Indian Med J; 2001 Sep; 50(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 11769020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research ethics across the 49th parallel: the potential value of pilot testing "equivalent protections" in Canadian research institutions.
    Lavery JV; McDonald M; Meslin EM
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):86-96. PubMed ID: 16459420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.
    Atici E; Erdemir AD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 18375684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human ethics and research governance: implications for surgical research.
    Simon Carney A; Watson DI
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Jun; 78(6):421-3. PubMed ID: 18522555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human rights and ethical considerations in oral health research.
    Ellen RP; Singleton R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):439. PubMed ID: 18538067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical review of research on human subjects at Unilever: reflections on governance.
    Sheehan M; Marti V; Roberts T
    Bioethics; 2014 Jul; 28(6):284-92. PubMed ID: 23841908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
    Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethics creep or governance creep? Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECS).
    Gorman SM
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2011 Sep; 29(4):14.1-16. PubMed ID: 22397089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
    Lynn MR; Nelson DK
    Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the level of statistician participation on Canadian-based research ethics boards.
    Thabane L; Childs A; Lafontaine A
    IRB; 2005; 27(2):11-4. PubMed ID: 15948326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Translating ethics into law: duties of care in health research involving humans.
    Zimmerman SV
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):13-8. PubMed ID: 16459410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research ethics boards: the protection of human subjects.
    Lestou VS; Ondrusek N; Blajchman MA
    PLoS Med; 2006 Oct; 3(10):e472; author reply e471. PubMed ID: 17076582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges faced by research ethics committees in El Salvador: results from a focus group study.
    Camp JW; Barfield RC; Rodriguez V; Young AJ; Finerman R; Caniza MA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 18302541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
    Wichman A
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.