182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12141224)
1. Genetic and metabolic screening of newborns: must health care providers seek explicit parental consent?
Wildeman S; Downie J
Health Law J; 2001; 9():61-111. PubMed ID: 12141224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptance of extended newborn screening: the problem of parental non-compliance.
Sewell AC; Gebhardt B; Herwig J; Rauterberg EW
Eur J Pediatr; 2004 Dec; 163(12):755-6. PubMed ID: 15480776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?
Paris JJ; Ferranti J; Reardon F
J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 11789063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Genetic diagnosis regulation of 2009 endangers newborn infants massively. Collaborative explanation of the Child Network e. V. and German Society of Social Pediatrics and Youth Medicine].
;
Kinderkrankenschwester; 2010 Oct; 29(10):433. PubMed ID: 21192476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity.
Swidler RN
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Public participation in medical policy-making and the status of consumer autonomy: the example of newborn-screening programs in the United States.
Hiller EH; Landenburger G; Natowicz MR
Am J Public Health; 1997 Aug; 87(8):1280-8. PubMed ID: 9279262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standards for family decisions: replacing best interests with harm prevention.
Dresser R
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 12859819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Advance care planning.
Gillick MR
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jan; 350(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 14702421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Neonatal screening--more hidden compulsion?].
Hofmann B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(3):291-3. PubMed ID: 20160777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Newborn screening--setting evidence-based policy for protection.
Natowicz M
N Engl J Med; 2005 Sep; 353(9):867-70. PubMed ID: 16135829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
Adamson EH
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
Fader JF
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
Caffera SM
Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Inborn errors of metabolism and expanded newborn screening: review and update.
Mak CM; Lee HC; Chan AY; Lam CW
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 2013 Nov; 50(6):142-62. PubMed ID: 24295058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Good laboratory practices for biochemical genetic testing and newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Recomm Rep; 2012 Apr; 61(RR-2):1-44. PubMed ID: 22475884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expanding the newborn screen: terrific or troubling?
Kunk RM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1998; 23(5):266-71. PubMed ID: 9747090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Legal Dimensions of Genomic Sequencing in Newborn Screening.
Zacharias RL; Smith ME; King JS
Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 Jul; 48 Suppl 2():S39-S41. PubMed ID: 30133728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Against the tide: arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment.
Ross LF
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2009; 18(3):302-15; discussion 315-22. PubMed ID: 19460233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protecting the privacy of newborns.
Johnson A
NCSL Legisbrief; 2003 Feb; 11(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 12585316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reversal of fortune--Re A (Conjoined Twins) and beyond: who should make treatment decisions on behalf of young children?
Michalowski S
Health Law J; 2001; 9():149-69. PubMed ID: 12141219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
