173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1214252)
1. Florida's experience with an intrauterine device for the nulliparous patients.
Caraway AF
J Reprod Med; 1975 Sep; 15(3):114-6. PubMed ID: 1214252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Martorella LA; Esposito JM
J Reprod Med; 1975 Apr; 14(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 1142352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Copper-7 intrauterine device (Gravigard). Report of experience].
Jürgensen O; Stenzel I; Wirth A; Sina D; Taubert HD
Fortschr Med; 1976 Mar; 94(9):515-21. PubMed ID: 964914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate postabortion intrauterine contraception in nulliparous adolescents.
Goldman JA; Dekel A; Reichman J
Isr J Med Sci; 1979 Jun; 15(6):522-5. PubMed ID: 457386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An audit of intrauterine device usage and outcome in general practice.
Presley AP
Practitioner; 1980 Oct; 224(1348):1089-91. PubMed ID: 7220438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.
Lassner KJ; Chen CH; Kropsch LA; Oberle MW; Lopes IM; Morris L
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Sep; 29(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 8520606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of continuation rates of intrauterine devices.
Measham AR; Villegas A
Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 48(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 948377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experience with the 25-S double coil intrauterine contraceptive device (a preliminary report).
Vaughn BJ; Lee RC
J Reprod Med; 1974 Sep; 13(3):119-21. PubMed ID: 4413361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Health risks of intrauterine contraception (author's transl)].
Keith LG; Berger GS; Edelman DA
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Jun; 11(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 12338737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contraceptive devices. IUD failures in the first year.
Kaelson PA
J Kans Med Soc; 1976 Jun; 77(6):246-7. PubMed ID: 1270855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contraception with intrauterine devices.
Parr EL
Bioscience; 1973 May; 23(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4803454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Pregnancies with intra-uterine devices in-situ (author's transl)].
Obolensky W; Bucheli J
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Aug; 35(8):632-9. PubMed ID: 1175906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
Forrest JD
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Letter: Intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Watson DS
Med J Aust; 1974 May; 1(20):811. PubMed ID: 4852831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experience with Progestasert beyond one year of use.
Wan LS
Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jul; 2(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 12278911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of a modified copper intrauterine device in nulliparous women with small uterine axial length.
Goldstuck ND
J Reprod Med; 1980 Oct; 25(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 7431367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The experience with Dalkon shield in UCLA family planning clinic].
Wang AC
Nihon Funin Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jul; 19():248-53. PubMed ID: 12158546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation and follow-up on 3,829 IUD procedures.
Hindle WH
Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1978; 45():105-10. PubMed ID: 715859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A critical ('stress') evaluation of the combined ML Copper 250-short IUD in nulliparous women.
Goldstuck ND
Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Oct; 2(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 12336989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
