203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12142630)
21. Early cyclosporine C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo kidney transplant patients: a prospective randomized single-center pilot study.
Kyllönen LE; Salmela KT
Transplantation; 2006 Apr; 81(7):1010-5. PubMed ID: 16612277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Limitations of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
Hmiel SP; Canter C; Shepherd R; Lassa-Claxton S; Nadler M
Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 17631021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: is it worthwhile?
Midtvedt K; Fauchald P; Bergan S; Høieggen A; Hallan S; Svarstad E; Bergrem H; Eriksen BO; Pfeffer PF; Dalen I; Leivestad T
Transplantation; 2003 Oct; 76(8):1236-8. PubMed ID: 14578761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Abbreviated AUC monitoring of cyclosporine more adequately identified patients at risk for acute rejection during induction of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation than recommended C2 concentration values.
Troncoso P; Ortiz AM; Jara A; Vilches S
Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 19249495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Efficacy of therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporine through C2 and AUC(0-4) during the first 24 months following kidney transplantation].
Vavić N; Ignjatović L; Drasković B; Hrvacević R; Kovacević Z; Paunić Z
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2008 Feb; 65(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 18365668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases.
Büchler M; Chadban S; Cole E; Midtvedt K; Thervet E; Prestele H; Keown P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 16204301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical benefit of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine 2-hr post-dose levels compared with trough levels in stable heart transplant patients.
Cantarovich M; Elstein E; de Varennes B; Barkun JS
Transplantation; 1999 Dec; 68(12):1839-42. PubMed ID: 10628760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rationale for monitoring cyclosporine concentration at 2 hours after administration in infants posttransplantation.
Furlan V; Lykavieris P; Maubert MA; Habes D; Debray D
Transplant Proc; 2009 Oct; 41(8):3333-4. PubMed ID: 19857744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Limited sampling strategy for cyclosporine (Neoral) area under the curve monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
Strong DK; Lai A; Primmett D; White CT; Lirenman DS; Carter JE; Hurley RM; Virji M; Ensom MH
Pediatr Transplant; 2005 Oct; 9(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 16176411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cyclosporine monitoring in the early post-transplant period in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Frauca E; Diaz MC; de la Vega A; Hierro L; Camarena C; Muñoz Bartolo G; Díez R; Murcia J; Gámez M; Sanchez Peinado C; López Santamaría M; Andrés I; Jara P
Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 17631022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is C2 monitoring or another limited sampling strategy superior to C0 monitoring in improving clinical outcomes in adult liver transplant recipients?
Marin JG; Levine M; Ensom MH
Ther Drug Monit; 2006 Oct; 28(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 17038878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Randomized, trough blood cyclosporine concentration-controlled trial to compare the pharmacodynamics of Sandimmune and Neoral in de novo lung transplant recipients.
Trull A; Steel L; Sharples L; Stewart S; Parameshwar J; McNeil K; Wallwork J
Ther Drug Monit; 1999 Feb; 21(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 10051050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cyclosporine C2 levels have impact on incidence of rejection in de novo lung but not heart transplant recipients: the NOCTURNE study.
Iversen M; Nilsson F; Sipponen J; Eiskjaer H; Mared L; Bergan S; Nyström U; Fagertun HE; Solbu D; Simonsen S
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Sep; 28(9):919-26. PubMed ID: 19716045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-hour post-dose cyclosporine levels in renal transplantation in Argentina: a cost-effective strategy for reducing acute rejection.
Balshaw R; Machnicki G; Carreño CA; Toselli L; Otero A; Keown PA
Transplant Proc; 2005 Mar; 37(2):871-4. PubMed ID: 15848560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation].
Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L
Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of C0 and C2 cyclosporine monitoring in long-term renal transplant recipients.
Marcén R; Pascual J; Tato A; Villafruela JJ; Teruel JL; Rivera ME; Tenorio M; Fernández M; Burgos FJ; Ortuño J
Transplant Proc; 2003 Aug; 35(5):1780-2. PubMed ID: 12962793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporine in kidney transplantation: the Halifax experience.
Singh D; Kiberd B; Belitsky P; Fraser A; Balbontin F; Lawen J
Transplant Proc; 2004 Mar; 36(2 Suppl):414S-419S. PubMed ID: 15041377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Feasibility of C2 monitoring in Korean renal transplantation.
Park JB; Han YS; Kim SJ; Choi GS; Kwon CH; Lee SK; Kim DJ; Joh JW
Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3105-8. PubMed ID: 18089332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cyclosporin monitoring in Australasia: survey of laboratory practices in 2000.
Morris RG; Lam AK
Ther Drug Monit; 2002 Aug; 24(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 12142629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
