BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1214267)

  • 1. A new ethical approach to abortion and its implications for the euthanasia dispute.
    Gardner RF
    J Med Ethics; 1975 Sep; 1(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 1214267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human life symposium: a synopsis and critique.
    Taub S
    Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 6920538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drawing lines: the abortion perplex and the presuppositions of applied ethics.
    Weston A
    Monist; 1984 Oct; 67():589-604. PubMed ID: 16100833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion and euthanasia: recent developments of the law.
    Horan DJ
    Forum; 1977; 12(4):960-79. PubMed ID: 11663978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion and the value of life: a discussion of Life's Dominion.
    Kamm FM
    Columbia Law Rev; 1995 Jan; 95(1):160-221. PubMed ID: 11660105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
    Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The brain-life theory: towards a consistent biological definition of humanness.
    Goldenring JM
    J Med Ethics; 1985 Dec; 11(4):198-204. PubMed ID: 4078859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criticism of liberal/feminist views on abortion.
    Anderson SL
    Public Aff Q; 1987 Apr; 1(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 11655837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as patient.
    Murray TH
    Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):329-43. PubMed ID: 3595055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Viability, abortion, and the difference between a fetus and an infant.
    Engelhardt HT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jun; 116(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 4707545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The right to live.
    Koop CE
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):65-87. PubMed ID: 11663567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The moral status of the human embryo: a tradition recalled.
    Dunstan GR
    J Med Ethics; 1984 Mar; 10(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 6368829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion ethics.
    Fromer MJ
    Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion and self-defense.
    Davis N
    Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(3):175-207. PubMed ID: 11655659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion on demand.
    Rovinsky JJ
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 6608671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The person in abortion.
    Clarke L
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Jan; 6(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 10067555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
    Rice CE
    Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion and infanticide: is there a difference?
    Cannon D
    Policy Rev; 1985; No. 32():12-7. PubMed ID: 11655683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ensuring a stillborn: the ethics of fetal lethal injection in late abortion.
    Callahan JC
    J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 8605389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foetuses, famous violinists, and the right to continued aid.
    Davis M
    Philos Q; 1983 Jul; 33(132):259-78. PubMed ID: 11651766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.