These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12142693)

  • 1. Purse string-formed plication of the SMAS with fixation to the zygomatic bone.
    Saylan Z
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):667-71; discussion 672-3. PubMed ID: 12142693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Periauricular Purse-String Reinforced with SMAS plication and Malaria Fat Pad Elevation for Mid-and Lower Facial Rejuvenation: FACE-Q Report.
    Wang R; Yang J; Guo K; Zhong A; Tong J; Xiong L; Sun J
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 81(6S Suppl 1):S59-S65. PubMed ID: 30418281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suture suspension malarplasty with SMAS plication and modified SMASectomy: a simplified approach to midface lifting.
    Noone RB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 16525268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Purse-string suture of imbrication of SMAS and malar fat pad technique for midface and lower face lift].
    Zhan Z; Li W; Wang J
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 32(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 30043601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The frontal branch of the facial nerve across the zygomatic arch: anatomical relevance of the high-SMAS technique.
    Trussler AP; Stephan P; Hatef D; Schaverien M; Meade R; Barton FE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Apr; 125(4):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 20335873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift: a comparative study.
    Becker FF; Bassichis BA
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2004; 6(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 14732637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The S-Plus lift: a short-scar, long-flap rhytidectomy.
    Hopping SB; Janjanin S; Tanna N; Joshi AS
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Oct; 92(7):577-82. PubMed ID: 20594404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shortscar face-lift with the RoundBlock SMAS treatment: a younger face for all.
    Stocchero IN
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 17406939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the Effective Lift of Skin-Only, SMAS Plication, and Extended SMAS Face-Lift Techniques in a Cadaveric Study.
    Rao V; Basta MN; Jehle CC; Crozier JW; Woo AS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Feb; 151(2):223e-233e. PubMed ID: 36332084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction of the nasolabial fold: extended SMAS dissection with periosteal fixation.
    Mendelson BC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1992 May; 89(5):822-33; discussion 834-5. PubMed ID: 1561253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Approach to Selection of Face-Lift Techniques for Different Types of Faces: An Analysis of 1000 Asian Patients Over 9 Years.
    Kim DG; Lee SH; Bae SG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2024 Aug; 93(2):153-162. PubMed ID: 38984658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The face lift SMAS plication flap for reconstruction of large temporofrontal defects: reconstructive surgery meets cosmetic surgery.
    D'Arpa S; Cordova A; Pirrello R; Zabbia G; Kalbermatten D; Moschella F
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 May; 127(5):2068-2075. PubMed ID: 21532434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The purse-string reinforced SMASectomy short scar facelift.
    van der Lei B; Cromheecke M; Hofer SO
    Aesthet Surg J; 2009; 29(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 19608066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateral SMASectomy, plication and short scar facelifts: indications and techniques.
    Baker DC
    Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Oct; 35(4):533-50, vi. PubMed ID: 18922307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SMAS fixation to the facial skeleton: rationale and results.
    Mendelson BC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Dec; 100(7):1834-42; discussion 1843-5. PubMed ID: 9393484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subperiosteal face lift: a 200-case, 4-year review.
    Heinrichs HL; Kaidi AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Sep; 102(3):843-55. PubMed ID: 9727455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 5-year study of the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift with minimal skin and superficial musculoaponeurotic system dissection: a durable, natural-appearing lift with less surgery and recovery time.
    Finger ER
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(5):1273-83; discussion 1284. PubMed ID: 11373573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the SMAS Flap Facelift Safe? A Comparison of Complications Between the Sub-SMAS Approach Versus the Subcutaneous Approach With or Without SMAS Plication in Aesthetic Rhytidectomy at an Academic Institution.
    Rammos CK; Mohan AT; Maricevich MA; Maricevich RL; Adair MJ; Jacobson SR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):870-6. PubMed ID: 26311561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rhytidectomy Utilizing Bidirectional Self-Retaining Sutures: The Bidirectional Lift and the Extended Bidirectional Lift.
    O'Connell JB
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Aug; 35(6):633-43. PubMed ID: 26229124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison Between Two Methods of Face-Lift Surgery in Nine Cadavers: SMAS (Superficial Musculo-Aponeurotic System) Versus MACS (Minimal Access Cranial Suspension).
    Mohammadi S; Ahmadi A; Salem MM; Safdarian M; Ilkhani S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 39(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26296636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.