These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12142775)

  • 1. Surveying physicians: do components of the "Total Design Approach" to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians?
    Field TS; Cadoret CA; Brown ML; Ford M; Greene SM; Hill D; Hornbrook MC; Meenan RT; White MJ; Zapka JM
    Med Care; 2002 Jul; 40(7):596-605. PubMed ID: 12142775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.
    VanGeest JB; Johnson TP; Welch VL
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):303-21. PubMed ID: 17986667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.
    Grava-Gubins I; Scott S
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18854472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risks and rewards of using prepaid vs. postpaid incentive checks on a survey of physicians.
    Wiant K; Geisen E; Creel D; Willis G; Freedman A; de Moor J; Klabunde C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 30305049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National survey of physicians to determine the effect of unconditional incentives on response rates of physician postal surveys.
    Abdulaziz K; Brehaut J; Taljaard M; Émond M; Sirois MJ; Lee JS; Wilding L; Perry JJ
    BMJ Open; 2015 Feb; 5(2):e007166. PubMed ID: 25694460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
    Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.
    Edwards P; Roberts I; Clarke M; DiGuiseppi C; Pratap S; Wentz R; Kwan I
    BMJ; 2002 May; 324(7347):1183. PubMed ID: 12016181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.
    Kellerman SE; Herold J
    Am J Prev Med; 2001 Jan; 20(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11137777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.
    Thorpe C; Ryan B; McLean SL; Burt A; Stewart M; Brown JB; Reid GJ; Harris S
    Fam Pract; 2009 Feb; 26(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19074758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing response rates in physician surveys: the limited utility of electronic options.
    Nicholls K; Chapman K; Shaw T; Perkins A; Sullivan MM; Crutchfield S; Reed E
    Health Serv Res; 2011 Oct; 46(5):1675-82. PubMed ID: 21492157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surveying nurses: identifying strategies to improve participation.
    VanGeest J; Johnson TP
    Eval Health Prof; 2011 Dec; 34(4):487-511. PubMed ID: 21454329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.
    Asch DA; Jedrziewski MK; Christakis NA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Oct; 50(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 9368521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Telephone vs. Web-based prescreening predicts early but not overall physician response to a mailed survey.
    Bonuedie H; Kim E; Long J; Ryskina K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():134-135. PubMed ID: 27498375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.
    Halpern SD; Ubel PA; Berlin JA; Asch DA
    Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9):834-9. PubMed ID: 12218773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians.
    Brtnikova M; Crane LA; Allison MA; Hurley LP; Beaty BL; Kempe A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202755. PubMed ID: 30138406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mail survey of United States hematologists and oncologists: a comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes.
    Streiff MB; Dundes L; Spivak JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 54(4):430-2. PubMed ID: 11297894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short report: encouraging GPs to complete postal questionnaires--one big prize or many small prizes? A randomized controlled trial.
    Thomson CE; Paterson-Brown S; Russell D; McCaldin D; Russell IT
    Fam Pract; 2004 Dec; 21(6):697-8. PubMed ID: 15531624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
    VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Sequential Prepaid Incentives on Response Rates, Data Quality, Sample Representativeness, and Costs in a Mail Survey of Physicians.
    Dykema J; Stevenson J; Assad N; Kniss C; Taylor CA
    Eval Health Prof; 2021 Sep; 44(3):235-244. PubMed ID: 32924566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.