BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12143783)

  • 1. Mechanical index.
    de Jong N
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2002 Mar; 3(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 12143783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound.
    Dalecki D
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2004; 6():229-48. PubMed ID: 15255769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound attenuation by encapsulated microbubbles: time and pressure effects.
    Krasovitski B; Kimmel E; Sapunar M; Adam D
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 30(6):793-802. PubMed ID: 15219959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnostic ultrasound--background and possibilities of development].
    Lindström K; Olofsson PA
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(41):4558-60, 4563-9. PubMed ID: 11107741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena.
    Postema M; van Wamel A; Lancée CT; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 30(6):827-40. PubMed ID: 15219962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of particle density on ultrasound-mediated transport of nanoparticles.
    Lea-Banks H; Teo B; Stride E; Coussios CC
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(22):7906-7918. PubMed ID: 27779121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of microchannel confinement on acoustic vaporisation of ultrasound phase change contrast agents.
    Lin S; Zhang G; Leow CH; Tang MX
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):6884-6898. PubMed ID: 28718774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Superparamagnetic nanoparticle-inclusion microbubbles for ultrasound contrast agents.
    Yang F; Li L; Li Y; Chen Z; Wu J; Gu N
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):6129-41. PubMed ID: 18854605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric array technique for microbubble excitation.
    Vos HJ; Goertz DE; van der Steen AF; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 May; 58(5):924-34. PubMed ID: 21622048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basic nonlinear acoustics: an introduction for radiological physicists.
    Harpen MD
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3241-7. PubMed ID: 17022218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High frequency nonlinear scattering from a micrometer to submicrometer sized lipid encapsulated contrast agent.
    Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 32(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 16616602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic Characterization and Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Long-Circulating Lipid-Coated Microbubbles.
    Li H; Yang Y; Zhang M; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 29127707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transient subharmonic and ultraharmonic acoustic emission during dissolution of free gas bubbles.
    Biagi E; Breschi L; Masotti L
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1048-54. PubMed ID: 16118987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low mechanical index contrast mode versus high mechanical index contrast mode: which is a more sensitive method for detecting Sonazoid microbubbles in the liver of normal subjects?
    Nihonmatsu H; Numata K; Fukuda H; Tanaka K; Ooba M; Maeda S
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 27033867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical index.
    Şen T; Tüfekçioğlu O; Koza Y
    Anatol J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 15(4):334-6. PubMed ID: 25880292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Future prospects for echo-enhancing agents.
    Fritzsch T; Schlief R
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Feb; 51 Suppl 1():56-8. PubMed ID: 8605775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation.
    Lin H; Chen J; Chen C
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Sep; 54(9):1317-30. PubMed ID: 27016369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of self-demodulation on the subharmonic response of contrast agent microbubbles.
    Daeichin V; Faez T; Renaud G; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3675-91. PubMed ID: 22614693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages in using multifrequency excitation of contrast microbubbles for enhancing echo particle image velocimetry techniques: initial numerical studies using rectangular and triangular waves.
    Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Kim H; Hertzberg JR; Shandas R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 15653236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonic backscatter from contrast producing collagen microspheres.
    Ophir J; Gobuty A; McWhirt RE; Maklad NF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1980 Jan; 2(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 7189617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.