These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [A comparative study of the reflective and apperceptive refractions (author's transl)]. Grimm W; Roloff C Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1979 Jan; 174(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 431022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Value and reliability of an automatic objective refractometer: the Dioptron Nova. A statistical study on computer of 600 measures]. Poletti J; Courrejou C Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1985 Apr; 85(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 3830459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical evaluation of the Dioptron II Ultima B]. Risse JF; Villard C; Carre H Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1179-84. PubMed ID: 6679824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Possibilities and limitations of refraction measurement by an automatic refractor. Verboven L; Missotten L Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1982; 201():65-70. PubMed ID: 7187260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic measurement of the refractive properties of the eye. Safir A Med Res Eng; 1972; 11(2):12-20. PubMed ID: 4665901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Development of refraction and visual acuity of squinting children (author's transl)]. Hentsch R; Frank E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1977 Jan; 170(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 850359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of the Humphrey automatic refractor. Wong EK; Patella VM; Pratt MV; Myers SW; Gaster RN; Leopold IH Arch Ophthalmol; 1984 Jun; 102(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 6732567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative study between subjective and objective refraction using the Autorefractor 6600 on 200 eyes in children]. Menerath JM; Michel M; Dalens H; Rigal D Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1189-93. PubMed ID: 6679825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The AO SR IIItm Subjective Refraction System: comparison with Phoropter measures. Woo GC; Woodruff ME Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Aug; 55(8):591-6. PubMed ID: 742650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic refraction and the private ophthalmologist: Dioptron II compared with subjective examination. Mailer CM Can J Ophthalmol; 1978 Oct; 13(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 743607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The AP-94 device for examination of ocular refraction]. Volkov BP; Ponkratov AN; Skvortsov IuS; Tregub VP; Shmidt ER Med Tekh; 1997; (1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9148079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative data on the study of visual acuity by the subjective and objective methods and with the aid of I.A. Viazovskiĭ's nystagmographic apparatus]. Pinchuk GD Oftalmol Zh; 1977; 32(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 593640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of prophylactic ophthalmological examinations of pre-school children and early correction of refraction errors on the visual acuity in school children (author's transl)]. Jakubowska-Pakułowa D; Adlerowa G Klin Oczna; 1980 Sep; 82(9):453-4. PubMed ID: 7442072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the performance of an automatic objective refractometer on 3,618 eyes]. Dufier JL; Abitbol M; Pigamo F; Prete T; Paris JP; Poitrenaud O J Fr Ophtalmol; 1987; 10(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 3305678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]