These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12144310)

  • 21. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A laboratory comparison of two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures.
    Jessel J; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):314-24. PubMed ID: 24740374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Observing behavior: effects of rate and magnitude of primary reinforcement.
    Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Sep; 78(2):161-78. PubMed ID: 12216976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.
    Grossbard CL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 3711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.
    Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):263-98. PubMed ID: 18540215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Successive independence and behavioral contrast in a closed economy.
    White KG; Alsop B; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 1402604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Varying reinforcer duration produces behavioral interactions during multiple schedules.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):83-100. PubMed ID: 15110911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Satiation causes within-session decreases in instrumental responding.
    Bizo LA; Bogdanov SV; Killeen PR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Oct; 24(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 9805790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules when time to reinforcement is held constant.
    Bell MC; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 23319434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of reinforcement magnitude and ratio values on behaviour maintained by a cyclic ratio schedule of reinforcement.
    Leslie JC; Boyle C; Shaw D
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):289-308. PubMed ID: 11131787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rapid acquisition of bias in signal detection: dynamics of effective reinforcement allocation.
    Hutsell BA; Jacobs EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 22287803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.
    Williams AM; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 10220929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The sensitivity of response rate to the rate of variable-interval reinforcement for pigeons and rats: a review.
    Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 16156139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.