These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12144500)
1. Comprehensive encoding and decoupling solution to problems of decoherence and design in solid-state quantum computing. Byrd MS; Lidar DA Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Jul; 89(4):047901. PubMed ID: 12144500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal control of a qubit coupled to a non-Markovian environment. Rebentrost P; Serban I; Schulte-Herbrüggen T; Wilhelm FK Phys Rev Lett; 2009 Mar; 102(9):090401. PubMed ID: 19392499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrafast optical control of individual quantum dot spin qubits. De Greve K; Press D; McMahon PL; Yamamoto Y Rep Prog Phys; 2013 Sep; 76(9):092501. PubMed ID: 24006335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficient universal leakage elimination for physical and encoded qubits. Wu LA; Byrd MS; Lidar DA Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Sep; 89(12):127901. PubMed ID: 12225124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantum computing in the solid state: the challenge of decoherence. Fisher AJ Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2003 Jul; 361(1808):1441-50. PubMed ID: 12869320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A scalable quantum computer with ions in an array of microtraps. Cirac JI; Zoller P Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6778):579-81. PubMed ID: 10766235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Encoding scheme using quantum dots for single logical qubit information onto four-photon decoherence-free states. Heo J; Hong C; Kang MS; Yang HJ Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15334. PubMed ID: 32948781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Demonstration of Fidelity Improvement Using Dynamical Decoupling with Superconducting Qubits. Pokharel B; Anand N; Fortman B; Lidar DA Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Nov; 121(22):220502. PubMed ID: 30547654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduced decoherence in large quantum registers. Krojanski HG; Suter D Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Oct; 97(15):150503. PubMed ID: 17155308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental demonstration of high fidelity entanglement distribution over decoherence channels via qubit transduction. Lim HT; Hong KH; Kim YH Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15384. PubMed ID: 26487083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Principles of control for decoherence-free subsystems. Cappellaro P; Hodges JS; Havel TF; Cory DG J Chem Phys; 2006 Jul; 125(4):44514. PubMed ID: 16942163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scalable solid-state qubits: challenging decoherence and read-out. Wendin G Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2003 Jul; 361(1808):1323-38. PubMed ID: 12869310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental protection of two-qubit quantum gates against environmental noise by dynamical decoupling. Zhang J; Suter D Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Sep; 115(11):110502. PubMed ID: 26406814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing constraints on quantum computer design by encoded selective recoupling. Lidar DA; Wu LA Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Jan; 88(1):017905. PubMed ID: 11800990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust dynamical decoupling for quantum computing and quantum memory. Souza AM; Alvarez GA; Suter D Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Jun; 106(24):240501. PubMed ID: 21770554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation in linear system-bath coupling. Sun C; Wang G; Wu C; Liu H; Feng XL; Chen JL; Xue K Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20292. PubMed ID: 26846444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Near-optimal dynamical decoupling of a qubit. West JR; Fong BH; Lidar DA Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Apr; 104(13):130501. PubMed ID: 20481868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scaling of decoherence for a system of uncoupled spin qubits. Jing J; Hu X Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():17013. PubMed ID: 26593876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]