BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12144724)

  • 1. Evaluation of a foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analyser in highly active, moderately active and less active young men.
    Swartz AM; Swartz AM; Jeremy Evans M; King GA; Thompson DL
    Br J Nutr; 2002 Aug; 88(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 12144724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of segmental multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition of adults across a range of body mass indexes.
    Shafer KJ; Siders WA; Johnson LK; Lukaski HC
    Nutrition; 2009 Jan; 25(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18723322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men.
    Pateyjohns IR; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Nov; 14(11):2064-70. PubMed ID: 17135624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.
    Boneva-Asiova Z; Boyanov MA
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 18435776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of leg-to-leg BIA in assessing body composition in high-school-aged males and females.
    Unick JL; Utter AC; Schumm S; McInnis T
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(4):301-13. PubMed ID: 17214406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tanita foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis system validated in older adults.
    Ritchie JD; Miller CK; Smiciklas-Wright H
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Oct; 105(10):1617-9. PubMed ID: 16183365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioelectrical impedance underestimates total and truncal fatness in abdominally obese women.
    Neovius M; Hemmingsson E; Freyschuss B; Uddén J
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Oct; 14(10):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17062802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.
    Thomson R; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
    Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17936443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis.
    Pietrobelli A; Rubiano F; St-Onge MP; Heymsfield SB
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Nov; 58(11):1479-84. PubMed ID: 15138459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of four methods to assess body composition in women.
    Eaton AW; Israel RG; O'Brien KF; Hortobagyi T; McCammon MR
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 May; 47(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8319671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body composition: validity of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis.
    LaForgia J; Gunn S; Withers RT
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 19114394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing body composition among 3- to 8-year-old children: anthropometry, BIA, and DXA.
    Eisenmann JC; Heelan KA; Welk GJ
    Obes Res; 2004 Oct; 12(10):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15536227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of body compositional indices assessed by underwater weighing, bioelectrical impedance and anthropometry in Indonesian adolescent girls.
    Isjwara RI; Lukito W; Schultink JW
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(4):641-8. PubMed ID: 18042523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and concurrent validity of Futrex and bioelectrical impedance.
    Vehrs P; Morrow JR; Butte N
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Nov; 19(8):560-6. PubMed ID: 9877148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can bioelectric impedance monitors be used to accurately estimate body fat in Chinese adults?
    Macfarlane DJ
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17215182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis to hydrostatic weighing in male body builders.
    Volpe SL; Melanson EL; Kline G
    Acta Diabetol; 2010 Mar; 47(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 19219400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of bipolar and tetrapolar impedance techniques for assessing fat mass.
    Dittmar M
    Am J Hum Biol; 2004; 16(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 15368607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of fat-free mass and body fat in Swiss and American adults.
    Kyle UG; Genton L; Lukaski HC; Dupertuis YM; Slosman DO; Hans D; Pichard C
    Nutrition; 2005 Feb; 21(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15723744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioelectrical impedance vs. four-compartment model to assess body fat change in overweight adults.
    Chouinard LE; Schoeller DA; Watras AC; Clark RR; Close RN; Buchholz AC
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2007 Jan; 15(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17228035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of total body water from foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with cancer cachexia - agreement between three prediction methods and deuterium oxide dilution.
    Bauer J; Capra S; Davies PS
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2005 Aug; 18(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 16011566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.