231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12145596)
1. The variable stiffness colonoscope: assessment of efficacy by magnetic endoscope imaging.
Shah SG; Brooker JC; Williams CB; Thapar C; Suzuki N; Saunders BP
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Aug; 56(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 12145596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of an electromagnetic colonoscope to assess maneuvers associated with cecal intubation.
Heigh RI; DiBaise JK; Prechel JA; Horn BJ; San Miguel S; Heigh EG; Leighton JA; Edgelow CJ; Fleischer DE
BMC Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 9():24. PubMed ID: 19358723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.
Shah SG; Saunders BP; Brooker JC; Williams CB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Jul; 52(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10882954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.
Rex DK
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors related to the effectiveness of variable stiffness colonoscope: results of a multivariate analysis.
Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; Brotons A; Sáez J; Girona E; Pérez E; Picó MD; Grau C; Vázquez N
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2014 Jan; 106(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 24689711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.
Shah SG; Brooker JC; Williams CB; Thapar C; Saunders BP
Lancet; 2000 Nov; 356(9243):1718-22. PubMed ID: 11095259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.
Brooker JC; Saunders BP; Shah SG; Williams CB
Gut; 2000 Jun; 46(6):801-5. PubMed ID: 10807891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on patient tolerance and sedation requirements during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Shah SG; Brooker JC; Thapar C; Suzuki N; Williams CB; Saunders BP
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jun; 55(7):832-7. PubMed ID: 12024136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a proprietary intraluminal stiffening wire device on cecal intubation time and rate with used colonoscopes; a randomized, controlled trial.
East JM
BMC Res Notes; 2013 Feb; 6():48. PubMed ID: 23379922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.
Shah SG; Brooker JC; Thapar C; Williams CB; Saunders BP
Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 12048623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 12195328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.
Kaffes AJ; Mishra A; Ding SL; Hope R; Williams SJ; Gillespie PE; Bourke MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Nov; 58(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 14595301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 11818918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope.
Prieto-de-Frías C; Muñoz-Navas M; Carretero C; Carrascosa J; Betés MT; de-la-Riva S; Herraiz MT; Súbtil JC
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2013 Apr; 105(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 23859449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: assessing the routine use of a stiffening sigmoid overtube to speed up the procedure.
Bell GD; Rowland RS; Rutter M; Abu-Sada M; Dogramadzi S; Allen C
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1999 Sep; 37(5):605-11. PubMed ID: 10723898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial.
Al-Shurieki SH; Marshall JB
Dig Liver Dis; 2005 Sep; 37(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 15916930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes.
Odori T; Goto H; Arisawa T; Niwa Y; Ohmiya N; Hayakawa T
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 11204990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study.
Hoff G; Bretthauer M; Huppertz-Hauss G; Sauar J; Paulsen J; Dahler S; Kjellevold Ø
Endoscopy; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1123-6. PubMed ID: 16281143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
