BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12146589)

  • 1. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retreatment in endodontics: treatment decisions by general practitioners and dental teachers in Finland.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Int Dent J; 2002 Jun; 52(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 12090260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of restorative materials in dental treatment of children and adults in public and private dental care in Finland.
    Widström E; Forss H
    Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 8052946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems associated with restorative materials--dentists' views in Finland and Sweden.
    Widström E; Sundberg H
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 1957249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of volume of multi-surface restorations in posterior teeth: Treatment options.
    Janus C; Sbeih I; Best AM
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 22313920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems.
    Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety of dental restorative materials: a survey of dentists' attitudes.
    Widström E; Forss H
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1991; 87(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 1749781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental practitioners' experiences on the usefulness of restorative materials in Finland 1992-1996.
    Widström E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 1998 Nov; 185(10):540-2. PubMed ID: 9874887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term survivals of 'direct-wax' cast gold onlays: a retrospective study in a general dental practice.
    Bandlish LK; Mariatos G
    Br Dent J; 2009 Aug; 207(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 19662053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Re-restoration decisions].
    Verdonschot EH; Plasschaert AJ; de Vries Robbé PF
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Mar; 105(3):84-6. PubMed ID: 11928406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 17501755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of patient characteristics on Finnish dentists' decision-making in implant therapy.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Implant Dent; 2002; 11(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 12271570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam.
    Dlugokinski M; Browning WD
    J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.