These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12146664)

  • 1. Peer-review in neuropsychology: can we increase effectiveness without sacrificing rigor?
    Bornstein RF
    Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):403-5. PubMed ID: 12146664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to assess the probability of acceptance of your new neuropsychological manuscript.
    Dellatolas G
    Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):426-7. PubMed ID: 12146675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.
    Duff K; O'Bryant SE; Westervelt HJ; Sweet JJ; Reynolds CR; van Gorp WG; Tranel D; McCaffrey RJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 24(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 19640873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 2016: Reviewing for Radiology-Reporting Guidelines and Why We Use Them.
    Levine D; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):659-62. PubMed ID: 27399329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why should I review journal manuscripts?
    Munk PL; Murphy KJ; Nicolaou S; Klass D
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 Aug; 65(3):193. PubMed ID: 25063742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Foreword: Sticks and Stones: Moving Toward a More Productive Peer-Review Process for Authors and Reviewers.
    Miller KH; West DC; Karani R
    Acad Med; 2017 Nov; 92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):Si-Siii. PubMed ID: 29065015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer-review: let's imitate the lawyers!
    Jelicic M; Merckelbach H
    Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):406-7. PubMed ID: 12146665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary.
    Allen LA; Ho PM
    Circ Heart Fail; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortex forum on peer-review multiple submissions.
    Carlstedt RA
    Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):411. PubMed ID: 12146667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Naïve views of peer-review and what do they tell us.
    Marques JF
    Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):417-8. PubMed ID: 12146671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to "Sell" Your Paper to a Peer-reviewed Journal.
    Van Meerbeek B; Frankenberger R
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 27073812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The estimated costs of manuscripts associated with OREF funding.
    Brand RA; Karam MD; Chaw EK; Coutts RD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Aug; 84(8):1470-2. PubMed ID: 12177279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refereeing mortus est, vivat refereeing.
    Della Sala S; Grafman J
    Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 12146653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The insularity bias.
    Henderson A
    Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 12146673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The art of peer-reviewing an original research paper: important tips and guidelines.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Apr; 29(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 20375370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The peer-review process: accept, revise, or reject?
    Bock O
    Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):419-20. PubMed ID: 12146672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiology 2016: The Care and Scientific Rigor Used to Process and Evaluate Original Research Manuscripts for Publication.
    Levine D; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 2016 Jan; 278(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 26690988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Writing an effective response to reviewers: the goal is to improve the study and get it published!
    Patino CM; Ferreira JC
    J Bras Pneumol; 2019 Feb; 45(1):e20190020. PubMed ID: 30843955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The manuscript review process.
    Sullivan EJ
    J Prof Nurs; 2002; 18(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 11976998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.