These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1214709)
1. Plaque assay and primary isolation of influenza A viruses in an established line of canine kidney cells (MDCK) in the presence of trypsin. Tobita K; Sugiura A; Enomote C; Furuyama M Med Microbiol Immunol; 1975 Dec; 162(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 1214709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Permanent canine kidney (MDCK) cells for isolation and plaque assay of influenza B viruses. Tobita K Med Microbiol Immunol; 1975 Dec; 162(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 1214707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The multiplication of an influenza C virus in an established line of canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Nerome K; Ishida M J Gen Virol; 1978 Apr; 39(1):179-81. PubMed ID: 641530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Established cell line sensitive to influenza C virus. Nerome K; Nakayama M; Ishida M J Gen Virol; 1979 Apr; 43(1):257-9. PubMed ID: 113496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simplified plaque assay for influenza viruses in Madin-Darby kidney (MDCK) cells. Huprikar J; Rabinowitz S J Virol Methods; 1980; 1(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 7228969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Replication and plaque assay of influenza virus in an established line of canine kidney cells. Gaush CR; Smith TF Appl Microbiol; 1968 Apr; 16(4):588-94. PubMed ID: 5647517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Isolation and study of influenza A viruses in different cell cultures]. Demidova SA; Gadashevich VN; Kirillova FM; El'-Shinnavi IM; Rovnova ZI Vopr Virusol; 1979; (4):346-52. PubMed ID: 113939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of a continuous cell line for the isolation of influenza viruses. Davies HW; Appleyard G; Cunningham P; Pereira MS Bull World Health Organ; 1978; 56(6):991-3. PubMed ID: 310738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Growth characteristics of influenza virus type C in avian hosts. Brief report. Austin MA; Monto AS; Maassab HF Arch Virol; 1978; 58(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 736797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A three years experience in using MDCK cell line for influenza virus isolation (1979--1981). Dumitrescu MR; Grobnicu M; Zilişteanu E; Alexandrescu V Arch Roum Pathol Exp Microbiol; 1981; 40(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 7340720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of different tissue cultures for isolation and quantitation of influenza and parainfluenza viruses. Frank AL; Couch RB; Griffis CA; Baxter BD J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Jul; 10(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 227920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Susceptibility of influenza viruses to interferon and to poly(I) . Poly(C) determined by the plaque reduction method. Machida H; Kuninaka A; Yoshino H Microbiol Immunol; 1980; 24(8):725-31. PubMed ID: 6158660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of suspension MDCK cells, adherent MDCK cells, and LLC-MK2 cells for selective isolation of influenza viruses to be used as vaccine seeds. Harada Y; Takahashi H; Trusheim H; Roth B; Mizuta K; Hirata-Saito A; Ogane T; Odagiri T; Tashiro M; Yamamoto N Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2020 Mar; 14(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 31651085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative efficacy of embryonated eggs and cell culture for isolation of contemporary influenza viruses. Monto AS; Maassab HF; Bryan ER J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):233-5. PubMed ID: 7462417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]