249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12147983)
1. Bogged down in CAP reform.
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):753. PubMed ID: 12147983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Terminator no solution to gene flow.
Shand H
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):775-6. PubMed ID: 12147996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):111-2. PubMed ID: 12634752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
Craddock N
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. European disarray on transgenic crops.
Abbott A
Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):946. PubMed ID: 19238685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. European Parliament vote encourages industry to proclaim green biotech.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):756-7. PubMed ID: 12147985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Caution: may be harmless if swallowed.
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):753. PubMed ID: 12147982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. European Union in disarray over GM seeds.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 11923823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Political will to lift the GMO moratorium emerging in Europe.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):758-9. PubMed ID: 12147986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Elements of precaution: recommendations for the regulation of food biotechnology in Canada.
Royal Society of Canada
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2001 Sep; 64(1-2):1-210. PubMed ID: 11592267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
Smyth S; McHughen A
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops.
Kok EJ; Kuiper HA
Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):439-44. PubMed ID: 14512230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whither agbiotechnology?
Val Giddings L
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):274-6. PubMed ID: 16525385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops.
Kalaitzandonakes N; Alston JM; Bradford KJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology.
Apel A
N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 20472105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Divisions sink US consensus effort on transgenic food.
Knight J
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):574. PubMed ID: 12789300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Off the rails.
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):247. PubMed ID: 18327213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fuelling the 9 billion.
Martindale W; Trewavas A
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18846065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
