BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12147987)

  • 1. USDA poised to reconsolidate biotech regulatory units.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):759. PubMed ID: 12147987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
    Mandal GN
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. USDA appeases organic lobby.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):217. PubMed ID: 10096276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
    Waltz E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Playing catch-up.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):637. PubMed ID: 15175666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liberty Link rice raises specter of tightened regulations.
    Vermij P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1301-2. PubMed ID: 17093456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Growing pains.
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7184):127. PubMed ID: 18337774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EPA issues, USDA amends respective biotech rules.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jun; 15(6):503. PubMed ID: 9181563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
    Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
    FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The environmental impact subterfuge.
    Conko G; Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1256-8. PubMed ID: 21139607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
    McHughen A; Smyth S
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Security worries stifle report on agricultural bioterror.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6903):99. PubMed ID: 12226623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Growing pains.
    Nature; 2011 Jul; 475(7356):265-6. PubMed ID: 21776037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic engineering poses new containment challenges.
    Krisberg K
    Nations Health; 2004 Mar; 34(2):6. PubMed ID: 15255006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When biotech crosses borders.
    Angulo E; Gilna B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18327233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current USDA procedures for licensing biotechnology-derived veterinary biologicals.
    Gay CG
    Dev Biol Stand; 1992; 79():65-74. PubMed ID: 1286767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: A word from USDA.
    Gipson C
    Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Mar; 38(3):80. PubMed ID: 19229221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.