These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12147987)

  • 1. USDA poised to reconsolidate biotech regulatory units.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):759. PubMed ID: 12147987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
    Mandal GN
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. USDA appeases organic lobby.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):217. PubMed ID: 10096276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
    Waltz E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Playing catch-up.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):637. PubMed ID: 15175666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liberty Link rice raises specter of tightened regulations.
    Vermij P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1301-2. PubMed ID: 17093456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Growing pains.
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7184):127. PubMed ID: 18337774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EPA issues, USDA amends respective biotech rules.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jun; 15(6):503. PubMed ID: 9181563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
    Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
    FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The environmental impact subterfuge.
    Conko G; Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1256-8. PubMed ID: 21139607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
    McHughen A; Smyth S
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Security worries stifle report on agricultural bioterror.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6903):99. PubMed ID: 12226623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Growing pains.
    Nature; 2011 Jul; 475(7356):265-6. PubMed ID: 21776037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic engineering poses new containment challenges.
    Krisberg K
    Nations Health; 2004 Mar; 34(2):6. PubMed ID: 15255006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When biotech crosses borders.
    Angulo E; Gilna B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18327233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current USDA procedures for licensing biotechnology-derived veterinary biologicals.
    Gay CG
    Dev Biol Stand; 1992; 79():65-74. PubMed ID: 1286767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: A word from USDA.
    Gipson C
    Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Mar; 38(3):80. PubMed ID: 19229221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.