35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12148392)
1. Evaluation of 500 cases of Pap's test in Mymensingh.
Talukder MS; Huq MH; Haque A
Mymensingh Med J; 2002 Jan; 11(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 12148392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extensively keratinized squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix are difficult to grade.
Faquin WC; Brown FM; Krane JF; Renshaw AA; Cibas ES
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jan; 115(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11190810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: is it significant?
Selvaggi SM; Haefner HK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Nov; 13(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 8599925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of cervical smears at King Hussein Medical Centre, Jordan, over three and a half years.
Malkawi SR; Abu Hazeem RM; Hajjat BM; Hajjiri FK
East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):676-9. PubMed ID: 16335662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of cervical cytological abnormalities in Turkish population.
Atilgan R; Celik A; Boztosun A; Ilter E; Yalta T; Ozercan R
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2012; 55(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 22499301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MMP-9 expression increases according to the grade of squamous intraepithelial lesion in cervical smears.
Matheus ER; Zonta MA; Discacciati MG; Paruci P; Velame F; Cardeal LB; Barros SB; Pignatari AC; Maria-Engler SS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Oct; 42(10):827-33. PubMed ID: 24578283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Light microscopic study of cervical smear in a tertiary hospital at Dhaka.
Rahman MT; Afroze N; Tahmin T; Nipa NN; Faisal RH; Choudhury SR
Mymensingh Med J; 2010 Apr; 19(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 20395913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evolution of atypical gynecological cervical smears in a captive population].
Vilches K; Escalona A
Rev Med Chil; 1998 Mar; 126(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 9674300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Hall S; Lörincz A; Shah F; Sherman ME; Abbas F; Paull G; Kurman RJ; Shah KV
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 8812532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internal quality control indicators in cervical cytopathology of a university laboratory.
Cardoso Filho LI; Tavares SBN; Siqueira MLB; Dos Passos EN; Araújo NLAS; Martins JMA; Ribeiro AA; Dos Santos SHR
Cytopathology; 2018 Aug; 29(4):355-360. PubMed ID: 29893438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The many faces of atrophy in gynecologic cytology.
Tambouret RH; Wilbur DC
Clin Lab Med; 2003 Sep; 23(3):659-79. PubMed ID: 14560533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Rényi Entropies Operate in Positive Semifields.
Valverde-Albacete FJ; Peláez-Moreno C
Entropy (Basel); 2019 Aug; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33267493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of 37,438 consecutive cervical smear results in the Turkish population.
Isaoglu U; Yilmaz M; Delibas IB; Bilici AE; Kabalar ME
Arch Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 11(2):402-5. PubMed ID: 25995758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
