119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12148461)
1. [Contraception in Mexico].
Alvarado Durán A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2002 May; 70():227-35. PubMed ID: 12148461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women making contraceptive choices in 20th-century America.
Meldrum M
Lancet; 2012 Jul; 380(9837):102-3. PubMed ID: 22803208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion and contraception in Sweden 1870-1970.
Sjövall H
Z Rechtsmed; 1972; 70(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 4563635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Contraceptive update.
Segal S
Rev Law Soc Change; 1997; 23(3):457-69. PubMed ID: 10725056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing the Gräfenberg Ring in Interwar Britain: Norman Haire, Helena Wright, and the Debate over Statistical Evidence, Side Effects, and Intra-uterine Contraception.
Rusterholz C
J Hist Med Allied Sci; 2017 Oct; 72(4):448-467. PubMed ID: 28973592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The earliest influence of contraception on the incidence of conception].
Norgaard O
Ugeskr Laeger; 1977 Oct; 139(42):2537-9. PubMed ID: 335600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [A long-playing record: contraception].
Raynal C
Rev Hist Pharm (Paris); 2009 Jul; 57(362):145-62. PubMed ID: 20027792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The contraceptive revolution.
Diczfalusy E
Contraception; 2000 Jan; 61(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 10745064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contraception--past and future.
Glasie A
Nat Cell Biol; 2002 Oct; 4 Suppl():s3-6. PubMed ID: 12479606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A history and appraisal of intra-uterine contraception.
Barclay DL; Tafel RM
J La State Med Soc; 1967 Mar; 119(3):95-108. PubMed ID: 5343302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The development of contraceptive technology. Case studies of incentives and disincentives to innovation.
Gelijns AC; Pannenborg CO
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1993; 9(2):210-32. PubMed ID: 8458701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The checkered history and bright future of intrauterine contraception in the United States.
Hubacher D
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2002; 34(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12043715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contraceptive methods and devices. Updating the different medical problems].
Caletti G; Bassi R
Ann Sanita Pubblica; 1968; 29(2):271-329. PubMed ID: 4910024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. History of contraceptive method.
Tietze C
Indian J Public Health; 1968 Jan; 12(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 4886707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mexico, the father of the pill and the race for cortisone.
Renneberg R
Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 3(4):449-51. PubMed ID: 18412173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Clueless about contraception': the introduction and circulation of the contraceptive pill in state-socialist Poland (1960s-1970s).
Ignaciuk A
Med Secoli; 2014; 26(2):509-35. PubMed ID: 26054213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New technologies in contraception.
Rowlands S
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):230-9. PubMed ID: 19076955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. History of contraception and introduction of intra-uterine contraceptive devices in a rural area--Bandaragama, Ceylon.
Arumugam LG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1969; 48(4):550-66. PubMed ID: 4907782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "An Uncommonly Silly Law"--Contraception and Disparities in the United States.
Prescott HM
N Engl J Med; 2016 Feb; 374(8):706-8. PubMed ID: 26933846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hormonal contraceptive methodology: an historical review.
Linn ES
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2005; 50(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 16334417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
