540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12149327)
1. Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.
Felten A; Grandry B; Lagrange PH; Casin I
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2766-71. PubMed ID: 12149327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of susceptibility testing methods and analysis of mecA-positive susceptible strains.
Sakoulas G; Gold HS; Venkataraman L; DeGirolami PC; Eliopoulos GM; Qian Q
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):3946-51. PubMed ID: 11682512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of new Vitek 2 card and disk diffusion method for determining susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin.
Roisin S; Nonhoff C; Denis O; Struelens MJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2525-8. PubMed ID: 18550733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Vitek gram-positive susceptibility 106 card, the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test, and mecA analysis for detecting oxacillin resistance in a geographically diverse collection of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Yamazumi T; Furuta I; Diekema DJ; Pfaller MA; Jones RN
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 39(10):3633-6. PubMed ID: 11574584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 microg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Cauwelier B; Gordts B; Descheemaecker P; Van Landuyt H
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 May; 23(5):389-92. PubMed ID: 15112072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of oxacillin, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and moxalactam disk diffusion methods for detection of methicillin susceptibility in staphylococci].
Özel G; Aslan V; Bahar Erdem G; Çağatay M; Sencan I; Mert A
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Apr; 45(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 21644068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Cavassini M; Wenger A; Jaton K; Blanc DS; Bille J
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 May; 37(5):1591-4. PubMed ID: 10203531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Louie L; Matsumura SO; Choi E; Louie M; Simor AE
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 38(6):2170-3. PubMed ID: 10834971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test (MRSA-Screen) for detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative Staphylococci.
Louie L; Majury A; Goodfellow J; Louie M; Simor AE
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):4149-51. PubMed ID: 11682545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Detection of mecA in strains with oxacillin and cefoxitin disk tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus].
Lee Y; Kim CK; Kim M; Yong D; Lee K; Chong Y
Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Aug; 27(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 18094588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Methicillin resistance detection in Staphylococcus aureus: comparison between conventional methods and MRSA-Screen latex agglutination technique].
Soloaga R; Corso A; Gagetti P; Faccone D; Galas M;
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2004; 36(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 15174748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory detection methods for methicillin resistance in coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolated from ophthalmic infections.
Oliveira AD; d'Azevedo PA; de Sousa LB; Viana-Niero C; Francisco W; Lottenberg C; Martino MD; Höfling-Lima AL
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 17906764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Different Phenotypic Approaches To Screen and Detect
Kriegeskorte A; Idelevich EA; Schlattmann A; Layer F; Strommenger B; Denis O; Paterson GK; Holmes MA; Werner G; Becker K
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 28978682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Baddour MM; AbuElKheir MM; Fatani AJ
Curr Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 55(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 17924164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of phenotypic methods with mecA gene based polymerase chain reaction for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection.
Khawaja A; Arshad F; Khan I
J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Feb; 70(2):276-280. PubMed ID: 32063621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.
Kohner P; Uhl J; Kolbert C; Persing D; Cockerill F
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Sep; 37(9):2952-61. PubMed ID: 10449481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for the routine detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Boutiba-Ben Boubaker I; Ben Abbes R; Ben Abdallah H; Mamlouk K; Mahjoubi F; Kammoun A; Hammami A; Ben Redjeb S
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2004 Aug; 10(8):762-5. PubMed ID: 15301683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of methicillin/oxacillin resistance and typing in aminoglycoside-susceptible methicillin-resistant and kanamycin-tobramycin-resistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Hamdad F; Donda F; Lefebvre JF; Laurans G; Biendo M; Thomas D; Canarelli B; Rousseau F; Eb F
Microb Drug Resist; 2006; 12(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 17002544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA.
Anand KB; Agrawal P; Kumar S; Kapila K
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2009; 27(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 19172055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility 106 card and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test for determining oxacillin resistance in clinical bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
Yamazumi T; Marshall SA; Wilke WW; Diekema DJ; Pfaller MA; Jones RN
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 39(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 11136748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
