These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12153648)

  • 41. A randomised controlled trial comparing birthing centre care with delivery suite care in Adelaide, Australia.
    Byrne JP; Crowther CA; Moss JR
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Aug; 40(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 11065032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Women's experiences of unplanned pre-hospital births: A pilot study.
    Svedberg E; Strömbäck U; Engström Å
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2020 Jul; 51():100868. PubMed ID: 32444164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Twelve years and more than 30,000 nurse-midwife-attended births: the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California women's hospital birth center experience.
    Greulich B; Paine LL; McClain C; Barger MK; Edwards N; Paul R
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(4):185-96. PubMed ID: 7965188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A national survey of women's views of their maternity care in Scotland.
    Hundley V; Rennie AM; Fitzmaurice A; Graham W; van Teijlingen E; Penney G
    Midwifery; 2000 Dec; 16(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 11080466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Birth centers in Australia: a national population-based study of perinatal mortality associated with giving birth in a birth center.
    Tracy SK; Dahlen H; Caplice S; Laws P; Wang YA; Tracy MB; Sullivan E
    Birth; 2007 Sep; 34(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 17718869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Midwifery in Jordan.
    Adams CJ
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 7931696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Who decides the position for birth? A follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial.
    Thies-Lagergren L; Hildingsson I; Christensson K; Kvist LJ
    Women Birth; 2013 Dec; 26(4):e99-104. PubMed ID: 23932671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Women's perspectives on maternity services in Sweden: processes, problems, and solutions.
    Hildingsson I; Thomas JE
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2007; 52(2):126-133. PubMed ID: 17336818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hodnett ED; Lowe NK; Hannah ME; Willan AR; Stevens B; Weston JA; Ohlsson A; Gafni A; Muir HA; Myhr TL; Stremler R;
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1373-81. PubMed ID: 12234231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Birth at home.
    Chamberlain G; Wraight A; Crowley P
    Pract Midwife; 1999; 2(7):35-9. PubMed ID: 10481690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Maternity care outcomes: assessing a nursing model of care for low-risk pregnancy.
    Stone PW
    Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1998; 2(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9582819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Satisfaction and continuity of care: staff views of care in a midwife-managed delivery unit.
    Hundley VA; Cruickshank FM; Milne JM; Glazener CM; Lang GD; Turner M; Blyth D; Mollison J
    Midwifery; 1995 Dec; 11(4):163-73. PubMed ID: 8569517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
    Christensen LF; Overgaard C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Women's experiences and preferences following Caesarean birth.
    Dodd J; Pearce E; Crowther C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):521-4. PubMed ID: 15598289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Happy midwives, happy mothers. Interview by Lynne Pearce.
    Osbourne A
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Aug 3-9; 19(47):20-1. PubMed ID: 16101079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of preferred place of birth on the course of pregnancy and labor among healthy nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study.
    van Haaren-ten Haken TM; Hendrix M; Smits LJ; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; Severens JL; de Vries RG; Nijhuis JG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Feb; 15():33. PubMed ID: 25884308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [A midwife-led birthing unit].
    Lukasse M; Øian P; Aamodt G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 16415940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A cross-sectional survey of policies guiding second stage labor in urban Japanese hospitals, clinics and midwifery birth centers.
    Baba K; Kataoka Y; Nakayama K; Yaju Y; Horiuchi S; Eto H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():37. PubMed ID: 26911667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.