144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12154618)
1. Beyond Olmstead. What the New Freedom Initiative means for long-term care.
Maher L
Contemp Longterm Care; 2002 Jul; 25(7):19-21. PubMed ID: 12154618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Olmstead v. L.C.: implications for Medicaid and other publicly funded health services.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J; Stewart A
Health Matrix Clevel; 2002; 12(1):93-138. PubMed ID: 12013703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Playing the lottery: HCBS lawsuits and other Medicaid litigation on behalf of the developmentally disabled.
Feltz MK
Health Matrix Clevel; 2002; 12(1):181-238. PubMed ID: 12013699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term care after Olmstead v. L.C.: will the potential of the ADA's integration mandate be achieved?
Williams L
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 17(1):205-39. PubMed ID: 11216339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Barriers to access to health care. Introduction: are the walls tumbling down? Hardly. Are the sands shifting? Surely.
McKinney LW
Health Matrix Clevel; 2002; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12013696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicaid: past successes and future challenges.
Perkins J
Health Matrix Clevel; 2002; 12(1):7-38. PubMed ID: 12013702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Justice and equality in mental health law: the European experience.
Hale B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 17157380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arizona overwhelmingly adopts health care initiative.
Nichols AW
JAMA; 1997 May; 277(20):1645-8. PubMed ID: 9168298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Their promises of paradise": will Olmstead v. L.C. resuscitate the constitutional "least restrictive alternative" principle in mental disability law?
Perlin ML
Houst Law Rev; 2000; 37(4):999-1054. PubMed ID: 12071222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Policies stress more freedom of choice for people with disabilities.
Gelhaus L
Provider; 2002 Dec; 28(12):26-8, 31-2, 35-6. PubMed ID: 12491863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Olmstead decision: implications for state health policy.
Rosenbaum S
Health Aff (Millwood); 2000; 19(5):228-32. PubMed ID: 10992673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Federal report documents extensive discrimination against Katrina evacuees with psychiatric disabilities.
Psychiatr Serv; 2006 Sep; 57(9):1350-1. PubMed ID: 17007097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Utah could open the floodgates.
Lovern E
Mod Healthc; 2002 Feb; 32(7):7, 9. PubMed ID: 11892624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicaid EPSDT (Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Testing) changes help home care.
Murray JE
Caring; 1992 Jul; 11(7):54-8. PubMed ID: 10118565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. And some grow mad, and all grow bad: prisoners' constitutional right to receive psychiatric treatment.
Jennings EM
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(1):160-85. PubMed ID: 16100811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Where the action really is: Medicaid and the disabled.
Vladeck BC
Health Aff (Millwood); 2003; 22(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 12528841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrating the disabled into the community in the wake of Olmstead.
Priaulx E
Caring; 2003 Sep; 22(9):6-10. PubMed ID: 14618898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strengthening home and community-based care through Medicaid waivers.
Miller NA; Rubin A; Elder KT; Kitchener M; Harrington C
J Aging Soc Policy; 2006; 18(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 16635978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Circle of Medicaid-eligible caregivers broadens.
Gelhaus L
Provider; 2004 Sep; 30(9):20-4, 27-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 15458003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
