These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12156806)

  • 1. Consultation rejects human reproductive cloning.
    Human Genetics Advisory Commission
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 1999; 5(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 12156806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expert group to look at UK cloning law.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public consultation on human cloning launched.
    Bower H
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):411. PubMed ID: 9492655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. UK public consulted on ethics of human cloning.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9100):427. PubMed ID: 11655347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allow cloning in embryo research, says UK report.
    Loder N
    Nature; 1998 Dec; 396(6711):503. PubMed ID: 9859974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. UK consults public on clones for research.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):523. PubMed ID: 9468125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Call to strengthen UK ban on human clones.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1998 Dec; 352(9144):1917. PubMed ID: 11657091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UK authorities recommend human cloning for therapeutic research.
    Mayor S
    BMJ; 1998 Dec; 317(7173):1613. PubMed ID: 11645133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. House of Lords rejects challenge to therapeutic cloning.
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):23. PubMed ID: 14964208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning: public discourse in the UK.
    Sexton S
    Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):106-14. PubMed ID: 12755112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning?
    MacKellar C
    Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Britain urged to expand embryo studies.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5397):2167-8. PubMed ID: 9890819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cloning human embryos for spare tissue: an ethical dilemma.
    Bruce D
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2002; 8(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12731560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stem cell studies advance in Britain.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 12155135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loophole legalizes human cloning.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6862):381. PubMed ID: 11719761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human cloning: a challenge for legislation.
    Ranson D
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):383-5. PubMed ID: 12194467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee.
    Brownsword R
    Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cloning and positive liberty.
    Kaveny MC
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 13(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 11838488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientists react to government indecision.
    Brown P
    Nat Med; 1999 Aug; 5(8):855-6. PubMed ID: 10426295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report.
    House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
    Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):13-21. PubMed ID: 17115496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.