197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12156806)
1. Consultation rejects human reproductive cloning.
Human Genetics Advisory Commission
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 1999; 5(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 12156806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Expert group to look at UK cloning law.
Masood E
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Public consultation on human cloning launched.
Bower H
BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):411. PubMed ID: 9492655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. UK public consulted on ethics of human cloning.
Ramsay S
Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9100):427. PubMed ID: 11655347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Allow cloning in embryo research, says UK report.
Loder N
Nature; 1998 Dec; 396(6711):503. PubMed ID: 9859974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. UK consults public on clones for research.
Dickson D
Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):523. PubMed ID: 9468125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Call to strengthen UK ban on human clones.
Ramsay S
Lancet; 1998 Dec; 352(9144):1917. PubMed ID: 11657091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. UK authorities recommend human cloning for therapeutic research.
Mayor S
BMJ; 1998 Dec; 317(7173):1613. PubMed ID: 11645133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. House of Lords rejects challenge to therapeutic cloning.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):23. PubMed ID: 14964208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning: public discourse in the UK.
Sexton S
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):106-14. PubMed ID: 12755112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning?
MacKellar C
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Britain urged to expand embryo studies.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5397):2167-8. PubMed ID: 9890819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cloning human embryos for spare tissue: an ethical dilemma.
Bruce D
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2002; 8(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12731560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stem cell studies advance in Britain.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 12155135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Loophole legalizes human cloning.
Adam D
Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6862):381. PubMed ID: 11719761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Human cloning: a challenge for legislation.
Ranson D
J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):383-5. PubMed ID: 12194467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee.
Brownsword R
Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cloning and positive liberty.
Kaveny MC
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 13(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 11838488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientists react to government indecision.
Brown P
Nat Med; 1999 Aug; 5(8):855-6. PubMed ID: 10426295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):13-21. PubMed ID: 17115496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
