These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12159852)

  • 1. High court bars some drug tests.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Mar; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 12159852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Punitive versus public health oriented responses to drug use by pregnant women.
    Schroedel JR; Fiber P
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():217-35. PubMed ID: 12669331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Barton EF
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):261-92. PubMed ID: 12645550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing poor pregnant women for cocaine--physicians as police investigators.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2001 May; 344(22):1729-32. PubMed ID: 11386286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A feminist Fourth Amendment?: Consent, care, privacy, and social meaning in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Taslitz AE
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():1-79. PubMed ID: 14986665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.
    Weyrauch S
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crack babies and the Constitution: ruminations about addicted pregnant women after Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Marrus E
    Villanova Law Rev; 2002; 47(2):299-340. PubMed ID: 12680368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court voids limits to women in jobs on basis of fetus.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11646829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pregnant drug abusers are treated like criminals or not treated at all: a third option proposed.
    Kimbel AS
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 21(1):36-66. PubMed ID: 15799534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Woman is convicted of killing her fetus by smoking cocaine.
    Firestone D
    N Y Times Web; 2001 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 12159859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ACLU philosophy and the right to abuse the unborn.
    Johnson PE
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11650911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy, drugs, and the perils of prosecution.
    Mariner WK; Glantz LH; Annas GJ
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 11650909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Criminal liability for fetal endangerment: editor's introduction.
    Kleinig J
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 11650906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drugs in the womb: the newest battlefield in the war on drugs.
    Logli PA
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11650908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In utero in court.
    Moskowitz E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(6):4. PubMed ID: 11643209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ferguson v. City of Charleston, S.C.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 1999; 186():469-89. PubMed ID: 11868568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constitutional law: Fourth Circuit upholds cocaine testing of pregnant women.
    Dubin JM
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(3):279-81. PubMed ID: 11067607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion: the father's rights.
    Gilbert RA
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.