170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12159858)
1. Justices set back use of marijuana to treat illness.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2001 May; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 12159858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Justices say doctors may not be punished for recommending medical marijuana.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 14610768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical marijuana and the Supreme Court.
Okie S
N Engl J Med; 2005 Aug; 353(7):648-51. PubMed ID: 16107619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court rejects attack on medical marijuana.
Wolski K
N J Nurse; 2003 Dec; 33(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 14746112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court decision on medical marijuana use worries patient advocates.
Krisberg K
Nations Health; 2005 Aug; 35(6):1,14. PubMed ID: 16130240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical marijuana, American federalism, and the Supreme Court.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2005 Aug; 294(7):842-4. PubMed ID: 16106011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Governor Jon Corzine signs Medical Marijuana Bill into law.
Wolski K
N J Nurse; 2010; 40(1):8. PubMed ID: 20533750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Brewing a pot of hysteria.
Nat Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 8(8):971. PubMed ID: 16047019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. California's Compassionate Use Act and the federal government's medical marijuana policy: can California physicians recommend marijuana to their patients without subjecting themselves to sanctions?
Rojas LM
McGeorge Law Rev; 1999; 30(4):1373-425. PubMed ID: 15709269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Maryland's medical marijuana bills.
Retzky SS; Baker TD
Md Med; 2010; 11(4):20-3. PubMed ID: 21337972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical marijuana for pain: an emerging field.
Can Nurse; 2010 May; 106(5):10. PubMed ID: 20518161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Garden State just got greener: New Jersey is the fourteenth state in the nation to legalize medical marijuana.
Brown M
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2011; 41(4):1519-67. PubMed ID: 22368811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ashcroft v. Raich background.
Laughlin C
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 16083100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Justices accept case weighing assisted suicide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 15742514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Jumping frogs, endangered toads, and California's medical-marijuana law.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Nov; 353(21):2291-6. PubMed ID: 16306529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.
Lorber L
Gend Med; 2005 Sep; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lighting up a controversy.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2004 Sep; 100(9):41-43, 45. PubMed ID: 17598324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical marijuana 2010: it's time to fix the regulatory vacuum.
Cohen PJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(3):654-66. PubMed ID: 20880248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16432926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Justices mull medical marijuana laws.
AIDS Policy Law; 2003 Oct; 18(20):1. PubMed ID: 14626967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
