These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12159910)
41. Taking another look at the definition of an embryo: President Bush's criteria and the problematic application of federal regulations to human embryonic stem cells. Auerbach SB Emory Law J; 2002; 51(4):1557-604. PubMed ID: 15212030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Stem cell research and conditional federal funding: do state laws allowing more extensive research pose a problem for federalism? Schiller C Pepperdine Law Rev; 2004 May; 31(4):1017-54. PubMed ID: 16514766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Still strict on stem cells. Wadman M Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7241):950-1. PubMed ID: 19396105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics. Crockin SL Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research. Majumder MA; Cohen CB Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Bush vetoes bill to loosen policy on stem-cell research. Kean S Chron High Educ; 2006 Jul; 52(47):A17. PubMed ID: 17115488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Stem cells. CIRM awards seek to move cell therapies to the clinic. Kaiser J Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5954):780-1. PubMed ID: 19892950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. IRBs and human embryonic stem cell experimentation. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 16270438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Research ethics. NIH guidelines for stem cell research and gamete donors. Lo B; Parham L; Cedars M; Fisher S; Gates E; Giudice L; Halme DG; Hershon W; Kriegstein A; Rao R; Roberts C; Wagner R Science; 2010 Feb; 327(5968):962-3. PubMed ID: 20167773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The pedagogical significance of the Bush stem cell policy: a window into bioethical regulation in the United States. Snead OC Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):491-504. PubMed ID: 15742591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The promise and peril of embryonic stem cell research: a call for vigilant oversight. Frist B Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 167-76. PubMed ID: 12664942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Ethics. Private money, public disclosure. Kaiser J Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5936):28-30. PubMed ID: 19574366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Stem cells. Ethics questions add to concerns about NIH lines. Vogel G; Holden C Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):756-7. PubMed ID: 18687929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. President's Council on Bioethics: reproduction and responsibility. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 15452926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Biomedical research. Researchers generally happy with final stem cell rules. Holden C Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5937):131. PubMed ID: 19589969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. US health officials rally behind bid to relax rules on embryo research. Check E Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):809. PubMed ID: 15829922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination. Fujikawa R South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]