These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12160011)

  • 1. Nonlinear acoustic response through minute surface cracks: FEM simulation and experimentation.
    Kawashima K; Omote R; Ito T; Fujita H; Shima T
    Ultrasonics; 2002 May; 40(1-8):611-5. PubMed ID: 12160011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generation Mechanism of Nonlinear Rayleigh Surface Waves for Randomly Distributed Surface Micro-Cracks.
    Ding X; Li F; Zhao Y; Xu Y; Hu N; Cao P; Deng M
    Materials (Basel); 2018 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 29690580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface Crack Monitoring by Rayleigh Waves with a Piezoelectric-Polymer-Film Ultrasonic Transducer Array.
    Li X; Wong VK; Yousry YM; Lim DBK; Christopher Subhodayam PT; Yao K; Feng L; Qian X; Fan Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 36904868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generation mechanism of nonlinear ultrasonic Lamb waves in thin plates with randomly distributed micro-cracks.
    Zhao Y; Li F; Cao P; Liu Y; Zhang J; Fu S; Zhang J; Hu N
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Aug; 79():60-67. PubMed ID: 28433810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface/sub-surface crack-scattered nonlinear rayleigh waves: A full analytical solution based on elastodynamic reciprocity theorem.
    Xu L; Wang K; Su Y; He Y; Yang J; Yuan S; Su Z
    Ultrasonics; 2022 Jan; 118():106578. PubMed ID: 34560381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical and numerical modeling of nonlinear lamb wave interaction with a breathing crack with low-frequency modulation.
    Yuan P; Xu X; Glorieux C; Jia K; Chen J; Chen X; Yin A
    Ultrasonics; 2024 May; 140():107306. PubMed ID: 38579487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonlinear ultrasonic phased array with fixed-voltage fundamental wave amplitude difference for high-selectivity imaging of closed cracks.
    Ohara Y; Nakajima H; Haupert S; Tsuji T; Mihara T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):266. PubMed ID: 31370588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonlinear effects of micro-cracks on long-wavelength symmetric Lamb waves.
    Rjelka M; Köhler B; Mayer A
    Ultrasonics; 2018 Nov; 90():98-108. PubMed ID: 29940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear acoustic scattering by a partially closed surface-breaking crack.
    Pecorari C; Poznić M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):592-600. PubMed ID: 15759680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical simulation of nonlinear Lamb waves used in a thin plate for detecting buried micro-cracks.
    Wan X; Zhang Q; Xu G; Tse PW
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 May; 14(5):8528-46. PubMed ID: 24834908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transmission of Lamb waves across a partially closed crack: Numerical analysis and experiment.
    Matsushita M; Mori N; Biwa S
    Ultrasonics; 2019 Feb; 92():57-67. PubMed ID: 30245346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation of crack induced nonlinear elasticity using the combined finite-discrete element method.
    Gao K; Rougier E; Guyer RA; Lei Z; Johnson PA
    Ultrasonics; 2019 Sep; 98():51-61. PubMed ID: 31200274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulsed Rayleigh wave scattered at a surface crack.
    Jian X; Dixon S; Guo N; Edwards RS; Potter M
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e1131-4. PubMed ID: 16797641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling of nonlinear interactions between guided waves and fatigue cracks using local interaction simulation approach.
    Shen Y; Cesnik CE
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Feb; 74():106-123. PubMed ID: 27770666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fundamental wave amplitude difference imaging for detection and characterization of embedded cracks.
    Haupert S; Ohara Y; Carcreff E; Renaud G
    Ultrasonics; 2019 Jul; 96():132-139. PubMed ID: 30833180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fully noncontact inspection of closed surface crack with nonlinear laser ultrasonic testing method.
    Kou X; Pei C; Chen Z
    Ultrasonics; 2021 Jul; 114():106426. PubMed ID: 33812273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards quantifying the effect of pump wave amplitude on cracks in the Nonlinear Coda Wave Interferometry method.
    Qu S; Hilloulin B; Chupin O; Piau JM; Abraham O; Tournat V
    Ultrasonics; 2023 Jul; 132():106991. PubMed ID: 37001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of Rayleigh wave interaction with finite-size, surface-breaking cracks.
    Hassan W; Veronesi W
    Ultrasonics; 2003 Jan; 41(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 12464411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Surface Breaking Crack Using Rayleigh Wave Measurement.
    Lee FW; Chai HK; Lim KS
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Mar; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 26959028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Sensitive Frequency Range Method Based on Laser Ultrasounds for Micro-Crack Depth Determination.
    Li H; Jiang W; Deng J; Yu R; Pan Q
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.