276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12160501)
1. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone.
Diab FH; King PD; Barthel JS; Marshall JB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1120-5. PubMed ID: 8651156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Josso C; Roman S; Fumex F; Lepilliez V; Prost B; Lot M; Guillaud O; Petit-Laurent F; Lapalus MG; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jul; 66(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 17591468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve.
Maffei M; Dumortier J; Dumonceau JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Mar; 67(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 18155215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Hidaka N; Ichise Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 104(7):1650-5. PubMed ID: 19513021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
Zaman A; Hapke R; Sahagun G; Katon RM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Aug; 93(8):1260-3. PubMed ID: 9707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients.
Choe WH; Kim JH; Ko SY; Kwon SY; Kim BK; Rhee KH; Seo TH; Lee TY; Hong SN; Lee SY; Sung IK; Park HS; Shim CS
Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 21660907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Motomura Y; Matsui N; Kubokawa M; Kimura M; Ouchi J; Honda K; Endo S; Nakamura K; Takayanagi R
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 42(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18622302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Hidaka N; Ichise Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N
Dig Endosc; 2009 Jan; 21(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 19691797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moderate sedation for elective upper endoscopy with balanced propofol versus fentanyl and midazolam alone: a randomized clinical trial.
Levitzky BE; Lopez R; Dumot JA; Vargo JJ
Endoscopy; 2012 Jan; 44(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 22068700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of intravenous sedation in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Amornyotin S; Lertakayamanee N; Wongyingsinn M; Pimukmanuskit P; Chalayonnavin V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Feb; 90(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 17375635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.
Zaman A; Hahn M; Hapke R; Knigge K; Fennerty MB; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):279-84. PubMed ID: 10049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
