These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12161577)

  • 1. The case of Ms B: suicide's slippery slope?
    Keown J
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):238-9. PubMed ID: 12161577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The case of Ms B and the "right to die".
    Slowther AM
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):243. PubMed ID: 12161579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comment on Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [2002] 2 All England Reports 449.
    Stauch M
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):232-3. PubMed ID: 12161574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ms B and Diane Pretty: a commentary.
    Singer P
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):234-5. PubMed ID: 12161575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B.
    Coleman D; Drake S
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 12161578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A pretty pass: when is there a right to die?
    Hale DB
    Common Law World Rev; 2003; 32(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15973803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grasping the nettle--what to do when patients withdraw their consent for treatment: (a clinical perspective on the case of Ms B).
    Tweeddale MG
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):236-7. PubMed ID: 12161576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competent adult: refusal of medical treatment. Re AK.
    Laing J
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 14983847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Cruzan decision: 9.5 theses for discussion.
    Meilaender G
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 16038071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards the right to be killed? Treatment refusal, assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States and Canada.
    Lemmens T
    Br Med Bull; 1996 Apr; 52(2):341-53. PubMed ID: 8759232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Autonomy and the competent patient's right to refuse life-prolonging medical treatment--again.
    Manning J
    J Law Med; 2002 Nov; 10(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 12497738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The right to refuse treatment is not a right to be killed.
    Lowe SL
    J Med Ethics; 1997 Jun; 23(3):154-8; discussion 161-3. PubMed ID: 9220327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competent patients decide their treatment.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Mar; (176):5-6. PubMed ID: 12408121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blackman v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation.
    New York. Supreme Court, Kings County
    N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1997; 660():643-9. PubMed ID: 15584136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
    Goldmeier KE
    MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity.
    Goebel BC
    William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The constitution and the right to die.
    Peters PG
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 16038075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right to choose to die with dignity.
    Lanham D
    Crim Law J; 1990 Dec; 14(6):401-30. PubMed ID: 15999437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective.
    Saperstein D; Mishkin D
    CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.