These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12161911)
1. [Planning and simulation of minimally-invasive robotic heart surgery]. Coste-Manière E; Adhami L; Severac-Bastide R; Boissonnat JD; Carpentier A C R Biol; 2002 Apr; 325(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 12161911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Establishing the case for minimally invasive, robotic-assisted CABG in the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Jones B; Desai P; Poston R Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Jun; 12(3):E147-9. PubMed ID: 19546065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pain and the Quality of Life Following Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery. Ezelsoy M; Oral K; Caynak B; Bayramoglu Z; Akpinar B Heart Surg Forum; 2016 Aug; 19(4):E165-8. PubMed ID: 27585193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Current Status of Robot-assisted Cardiac Surgery in Japan]. Watanabe G; Ishikawa N Kyobu Geka; 2022 Jul; 75(7):489-495. PubMed ID: 35799483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A chance-constrained approach to preoperative planning of robotics-assisted interventions. Azimian H; Patel RV; Naish MD Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():2127-30. PubMed ID: 22254758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Comparison between Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery and Conventional Bypass Grafting Surgery in Proximal LAD Lesion. Ezelsoy M; Caynak B; Bayram M; Oral K; Bayramoglu Z; Sagbas E; Aytekın V; Akpınar B Heart Surg Forum; 2015 Apr; 18(2):E042-6. PubMed ID: 25924029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of robotic coronary surgery with intraoperative graft angiography and postoperative multislice computed tomography. Schachner T; Feuchtner GM; Bonatti J; Bonaros N; Oehlinger A; Gassner E; Pachinger O; Friedrich G Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4):1361-7. PubMed ID: 17383340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planning, simulation, and augmented reality for robotic cardiac procedures: The STARS system of the ChIR team. Coste-Manière E; Adhami L; Mourgues F; Carpentier A Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Apr; 15(2):141-56. PubMed ID: 12838484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic cardiothoracic surgery in Pakistan: a novel minimally invasive form of patient care. Naqvi SH; Sheikh A; Naqvi SH; Sheikh K J Pak Med Assoc; 2013 Jun; 63(6):812. PubMed ID: 23901696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of new technology on cardiothoracic surgical practice. Pennington DG Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Jan; 81(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 16368328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolution of and early experience with robot-assisted mitral valve surgery. Felger JE; Nifong LW; Chitwood WR Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 12008764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Novel Approach Using Computed Tomography Angiograms to Predict Sternotomy or Complicated Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass. Cook RC; Fung AY; Percy ED; Mayo JR Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(3):207-210. PubMed ID: 29905587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical factors influencing surgical approach selection of robotic-enhanced minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting]. Cheng N; Gao CQ; Yang M; Wu Y Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 51(11):1016-20. PubMed ID: 24444688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]