These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12162025)

  • 61. High-frequency monitoring using an electrostimulation audiometer.
    Thornton AR; Bell IE; Phillipps JJ
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Feb; 23(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 2706409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison between hearing threshold measurements made with and without the aid of an ear speculum.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P; Bennrup S; Sheppard H
    Audiology; 1983; 22(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 6651619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. High-frequency audiometry: air- and electric bone-conduction.
    Okstad S; Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1988; 449():159-60. PubMed ID: 3201942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. High-frequency audiometry. Response characteristics of the KH70 vibrator.
    Hallmo P; Sundby A; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 1842279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Audiometric zero for air conduction. A verification and critique of international standards.
    Robinson DW; Shipton MS; Hinchcliffe R
    Audiology; 1981; 20(5):409-31. PubMed ID: 7271593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Repeatability of high-frequency bone conduction thresholds.
    Frank T; Ragland AE
    Ear Hear; 1987 Dec; 8(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 3322900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Early hearing threshold changes and peculiarities of audiometric assessments among patients in a drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment center.
    Sogebi OA; Adefuye BO; Ajayi EA
    Afr Health Sci; 2021 Mar; 21(1):230-237. PubMed ID: 34394302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment using 'clicks' as test signals.
    Richter U; Fedtke T
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):478-87. PubMed ID: 16149243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Use of noise cancellation earphones in out-of-booth audiometric evaluations.
    Clark JG; Brady M; Earl BR; Scheifele PM; Snyder L; Clark SD
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28783994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [Determination of audiometric zero point for air and bone conductivity in extended range of high frequency].
    Gierek T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1979; 33(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 460887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Internet application to tele-audiology--"nothin' but net".
    Givens GD; Elangovan S
    Am J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 12(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 14964319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Virtual audiometer: technology integrated to teaching.
    Araújo DP; Araújo MEB; Alves ERA; Jales JMR; Araújo ES
    Codas; 2021; 33(6):e20200287. PubMed ID: 34550172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. High-frequency air conduction audiometry. Testing of a new low impedance circumaural transducer system in normal young persons.
    Hansen TS; Brask T; Larsen S
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8465139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [The evaluation of efficaciency of the "Słysze" screening test on the base of the results of hearing examinations in schoolchildren in Silesia in 2002 year].
    Gierek T; Gwózdź-Jezierska M; Slaska-Kaspera A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2007; 61(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 18552004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Audiometry database system using a local area network.
    Mizukami C; Yamamoto E
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 510():48-51. PubMed ID: 8128873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Attempt at establishing a normal range of values for bone conduction hearing thresholds in tone audiometry].
    Gierek T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1974; 28(6):643-50. PubMed ID: 4437934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Phone positioning influence in high-frequency audiometry.
    Crepaldi de Almeida EO; Nishimori AY
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 72(5):691-8. PubMed ID: 17221063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Automated audiometry - hearing tests with iOS based software suitable for "at home" tests?].
    Deeg ME; Mlynski R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2014 Sep; 93(9):586-7. PubMed ID: 25298995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. High-frequency audiometry: comparison of electric bone-conduction and air-conduction thresholds.
    Okstad S; Laukli E; Mair IW
    Audiology; 1988; 27(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3377723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Effect of atmospheric pressure on hearing in normal subjects.
    Kitahara M; Ozawa H; Kodama A; Izukura H; Inoue S; Uchida K
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 510():87-91. PubMed ID: 8128881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.