196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12164009)
1. Improving Gram-stained reproducible result by further adding clue cells in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis.
Lin DP; Pan BJ; Fuh JC; Huang TH
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2002 Apr; 18(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 12164009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, and quantitative PCR for Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Lactobacillus spp. for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women.
Sha BE; Chen HY; Wang QJ; Zariffard MR; Cohen MH; Spear GT
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4607-12. PubMed ID: 16145114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial vaginosis among a group of married Jordanian women: occurrence and laboratory diagnosis.
Abu Shaqra QM
Cytobios; 2001; 105(408):35-43. PubMed ID: 11368266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposal of a new cutoff for Nugent criteria in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Rodrigues FS; Peixoto S; Adami F; Alves Bda C; Gehrke Fde S; Azzalis LA; Junqueira VB; Fonseca FL
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Aug; 115():144-6. PubMed ID: 25957514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of Trichomonas vaginalis to bacterial vaginosis: a laboratory-based study.
El Sayed Zaki M; Raafat D; El Emshaty W; Azab MS; Goda H
J Infect Dev Ctries; 2010 Mar; 4(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 20351456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of microscopy methods for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].
Mota A; Prieto E; Carnall V; Exposto F
Acta Med Port; 2000; 13(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 11026143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gram stain method shows better sensitivity than clinical criteria for detection of bacterial vaginosis in surveillance of pregnant, low-income women in a clinical setting.
Tam MT; Yungbluth M; Myles T
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(5):204-8. PubMed ID: 9894174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis.
Menard JP; Mazouni C; Fenollar F; Raoult D; Boubli L; Bretelle F
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 20814710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Pap smear for detection of bacterial vaginosis.
Karani A; De Vuyst H; Luchters S; Othigo J; Mandaliya K; Chersich MF; Temmerman M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Jul; 98(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 17466304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of interpretation of gram-stained vaginal smears by Nugent's scoring system for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Zarakolu P; Sahin Hodoglugil NN; Aydin F; Tosun I; Gozalan A; Unal S
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Feb; 48(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 14972374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simplified gram stain interpretive method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Thomason JL; Anderson RJ; Gelbart SM; Osypowski PJ; Scaglione NJ; el Tabbakh G; James JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 1279973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial vaginosis in sexually experienced and non-sexually experienced young women entering the military.
Yen S; Shafer MA; Moncada J; Campbell CJ; Flinn SD; Boyer CB
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):927-33. PubMed ID: 14672465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of bacterial vaginosis in wet mount, Papanicolaou stained vaginal smears and in gram stained smears.
Platz-Christensen JJ; Larsson PG; Sundström E; Wiqvist N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Jan; 74(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 7856436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A comparison of 2 clinical laboratory methods in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].
González-Pedraza-Avilés A; Inzunza-Montiel A; Ortiz-Zaragoza C; Ponce-Rosas R; Irigoyen-Coria A
Aten Primaria; 1997 Apr; 19(7):357-60. PubMed ID: 9254139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of the score for Gram strains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].
Nicand E; Cavallo JD; Crenn Y; Meyran M
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1994 May; 42(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 7824329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Gram and Kopeloff stains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.
Libman MD; Kramer M; Platt R;
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 54(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 16427240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between cervical cytologic results and Gram stain as diagnostic tests for bacterial vaginosis.
Davis JD; Connor EE; Clark P; Wilkinson EJ; Duff P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):532-5. PubMed ID: 9322619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bacterial vaginosis: comparison of Pap smear and microbiological test results.
Tokyol C; Aktepe OC; Cevrioğlu AS; Altindiş M; Dilek FH
Mod Pathol; 2004 Jul; 17(7):857-60. PubMed ID: 15073605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Gram stain and Pap smear procedures in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Vardar E; Maral I; Inal M; Ozgüder O; Tasli F; Postaci H
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2002; 10(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 12648314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relation between Gram-stain and clinical criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis with special reference to Gram grade II evaluation.
Taylor-Robinson D; Morgan DJ; Sheehan M; Rosenstein IJ; Lamont RF
Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Jan; 14(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 12590785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
