These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12164199)

  • 1. Fertility ethics authority approves sex selection.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Sep; ():A16. PubMed ID: 12164199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Girl or boy? As fertility technology advances, so does an ethical debate.
    Grady D
    N Y Times Web; 2007 Feb; ():F5, F10. PubMed ID: 17312609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing in the sex of your baby.
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Sep; ():12WK. PubMed ID: 12159878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex selection: the response of the British Fertility Society to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority consultation document.
    Afnan M; Hunt J
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2003 Feb; 6(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 12663953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis: a response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine.
    Savulescu J; Dahl E
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Sep; 15(9):1879-80. PubMed ID: 10966977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A boy for you, a girl for me: technology allows choice. Embryo screening stirs ethics debate.
    Stein R
    Washington Post; 2004 Dec; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 15609465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 15038888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
    Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):268-9. PubMed ID: 15038890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A defence of common sense: a reply to David Heyd's "The ethics of sex selection for non-medical reasons".
    Engelen B; Vandevelde A
    Ethical Perspect; 2004; 11(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 16018101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender variety as a valid choice: a comment on the HFEA - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
    Robertson JA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):270-1. PubMed ID: 15038891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex selection: choice and responsibility in human reproduction. Response of the British Fertility Society to the public consultation document.
    Hunt J; Afnan M
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2003 Feb; 6(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12663954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex selection for gender variety by preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
    Robertson JA
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Sep; 78(3):463. PubMed ID: 12215317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex selection. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 177.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics
    ACOG Comm Opin; 1996 Nov; No. 177():4 p. PubMed ID: 11660573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. The Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine.
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Oct; 72(4):595-8. PubMed ID: 10521093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the "perfect child" of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
    Landau R
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e10. PubMed ID: 18757610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PGD and sex selection.
    Malpani A
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Feb; 17(2):517. PubMed ID: 11821306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US doctors say sex selection acceptable for non-medical reasons.
    Gottlieb S
    BMJ; 2001 Oct; 323(7317):828. PubMed ID: 11597963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A boy or a girl? The ethics of preconception gender selection.
    Flug J
    J Halacha Contemporary Society; 2004; (48):5-27. PubMed ID: 15540377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting sex selection: the growing popularity of new sex selection methods revives an old debate.
    Darnovsky M
    Genewatch; 2004; 17(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15083837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproduction opportunists in the new global sex trade: PGD and non-medical sex selection.
    Whittaker AM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 21975224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.