These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12165125)

  • 41. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite of Class V Cavities: Effect of Surface Treatment and Thermocycling.
    Valizadeh S; Hashemi SF; Hashemikamangar SS; Kharazifard MJ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jul; 21(7):781-786. PubMed ID: 33020363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials.
    Sadeghi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Jul; 9(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 23162589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of cavity-filling techniques on microleakage in class II resin restorations prepared with Er:YAG laser and diamond bur: A scanning electron microscopy study.
    Ozel E; Tuna EB; Firatli E
    Scanning; 2016 Sep; 38(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 26538487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microleakage of four different restorative glass ionomer formulations in class V cavities: Er:YAG laser versus conventional preparation.
    Delmé KI; Deman PJ; De Bruyne MA; De Moor RJ
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Dec; 26(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 19025411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of microleakage of three adhesive systems in class V composite restorations prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG laser.
    Kimyai S; Ajami AA; Chaharom ME; Oskoee JS
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2010 Aug; 28(4):505-10. PubMed ID: 20001320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing microleakage of composite restorations in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation or diamond bur.
    Arami S; Shahabi S; Tabatabaie M; Chiniforush N; Morshedi E; Torabi S
    J Conserv Dent; 2014 May; 17(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 24944442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and semi-direct composite resin restoration: a microleakage study.
    Bertrand MF; Brulat N; Lazzarini V; Marcato G; Namour S; Rocca JP
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Oct; 26(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 18800942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser tooth conditioning on the microleakage of self-adhesive resin cement.
    Kaviani A; Khansari Nejad N
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2021; 8(1):152-159. PubMed ID: 34693293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA; Dibb RG; Mondelli J
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 11203855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Microleakage of dual-cured adhesive systems in class v composite resin restorations.
    Kasraie S; Azarsina M; Khamverdi Z; Shokraneh F
    J Dent (Tehran); 2012; 9(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 23066474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of microleakage of class V restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following Er:YAG laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study.
    Luong E; Shayegan A
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2018; 10():83-92. PubMed ID: 29881311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Microleakage and microtensile bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based restorative systems.
    Santos MJ; Podorieszach A; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013; 34 Spec No 8():19-24. PubMed ID: 24568172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Microleakage of occlusoproximal adhesive restorations, effect of dentin moisture after acid etching.
    Carpena Lopes G; Colle Zanette A
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009; 58(11-12):593-600. PubMed ID: 20027130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.