These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12165417)
1. Dynamic anterolateral movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects activation of isofrequency bands through horizontal fibers in human auditory cortex. Ozaki I; Jin YC; Suzuki Y; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I Neurosci Lett; 2002 Aug; 329(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 12165417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects sequential activation of isofrequency bands in human auditory cortex. Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Jin CY; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Sep; 114(9):1681-8. PubMed ID: 12948797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex. Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination. Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m. Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli]. Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. Nakasato N; Fujita S; Seki K; Kawamura T; Matani A; Tamura I; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 94(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7536153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones. Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex. Rif J; Hari R; Hämäläinen MS; Sams M Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Dec; 79(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 1721574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Middle and long latency peak sources in auditory evoked magnetic fields for tone bursts in humans. Kanno A; Nakasato N; Murayama N; Yoshimoto T Neurosci Lett; 2000 Nov; 293(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 11036192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields. Rosburg T Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dipole location shift within the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components N100m and mismatch negativity (MMNm). Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 15003772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cortical responses to changes in auditory stimuli. Magnetoencephalographic studies. Sams M Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():124-30; discussion 131. PubMed ID: 1814143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in patients with absent brainstem responses due to auditory neuropathy with optic atrophy. Takata Y; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Kobayashi T Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 22119798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age-related functional differences between auditory cortices: a whole-head MEG study. Pekkonen E; Huotilainen M; Virtanen J; Sinkkonen J; Rinne T; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R Neuroreport; 1995 Sep; 6(13):1803-6. PubMed ID: 8541486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Side of the stimulated ear influences the hemispheric balance in coding tonal stimuli. Yu HY; Chen JT; Wu ZA; Yeh TC; Ho LT; Lin YY Neurol Res; 2007 Jul; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17535555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Interhemispheric asymmetry exists in female in the N100m source position of the auditory evoked magnetic fields]. Kanno A; Nakasato N; Hatanaka K; Ohtomo S; Suzuki K; Fujiwara S; Shirane R; Yoshimoto T No To Shinkei; 1998 Apr; 50(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 9592827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of interaural time differences on middle-latency and late auditory evoked magnetic fields. McEvoy L; Mäkelä JP; Hämäläinen M; Hari R Hear Res; 1994 Aug; 78(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 7982817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased right auditory cortex activity in absolute pitch possessors. Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1775-9. PubMed ID: 16237325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]