These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12166529)

  • 1. Phantoms for cross-calibration of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in infants.
    Hammami M; Picaud JC; Fusch C; Hockman EM; Rigo J; Koo WW
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2002 Aug; 21(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 12166529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in small subjects: conditions affecting clinical measurements.
    Koo WW; Hockman EM; Hammami M
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Jun; 23(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 15190045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of bone mass and body composition measurements in small subjects with pencil beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Feb; 23(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 14963057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices.
    Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Tylavsky F; Cauley J; Dockrell M; Genant HK
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Aug; 89(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 10926643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone and body composition measurements of small subjects: discrepancies from software for fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Dec; 23(6):647-50. PubMed ID: 15637212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
    Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
    Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solid anthropomorphic infant whole-body DXA phantom: design, evaluation, and multisite testing.
    Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
    Pediatr Res; 2013 Nov; 74(5):486-93. PubMed ID: 23999072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
    Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies.
    Hammami M; Koo WW; Hockman EM
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 15449572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DXA body composition corrective factors between Hologic Discovery models to conduct multicenter studies.
    Sutter T; Duboeuf F; Chapurlat R; Cortet B; Lespessailles E; Roux JP
    Bone; 2021 Jan; 142():115683. PubMed ID: 33045389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
    Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
    Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
    Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in piglets.
    Chauhan S; Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2003 Oct; 22(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 14559933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.
    Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Wu XP; Wacker WK; Ergun DL; Levine MA
    J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2208-16. PubMed ID: 22623101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interchangeability of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in piglets and infants.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 78(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 12885703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimates of body fat in children by Hologic QDR-2000 and QDR-4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers compared with deuterium dilution.
    Robotham DR; Schoeller DA; Mercado AB; Mirch MC; Theim KR; Reynolds JC; Yanovski JA
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2006 Mar; 42(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 16540807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.