These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12168171)

  • 1. Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing.
    Macaulay W; DiGiovanni CW; Restrepo A; Saleh KJ; Walsh H; Crossett LS; Peterson MG; Li S; Salvati EA
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 12168171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.
    Messick KJ; Miller MA; Damron LA; Race A; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1115-21. PubMed ID: 17785755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization and comparison of three vacuum mixing systems for porosity reduction of Simplex P cement.
    Davies JP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 May; (254):261-9. PubMed ID: 2323141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength.
    Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Porosity of bone cement reduced by mixing and collecting under vacuum.
    Wang JS; Franzén H; Jonsson E; Lidgren L
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1993 Apr; 64(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 8498171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?
    Wang JS; Toksvig-Larsen S; Müller-Wille P; Franźen H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8736030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Air inclusion in bone cement. Importance of the mixing technique.
    Lindén U; Gillquist J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Oct; (247):148-51. PubMed ID: 2490849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.
    Geiger MH; Keating EM; Ritter MA; Ginther JA; Faris PM; Meding JB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jan; (382):258-66. PubMed ID: 11153996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Porosity of various preparations of acrylic bone cements.
    Jasty M; Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Oct; (259):122-9. PubMed ID: 2208846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the Advanced One-Step Mixing System Under Non-Vacuum on the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement.
    Schommer JV; Chong AC; Erickson TD
    Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 38919359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of mixing on gentamicin release from polymethylmethacrylate bone cements.
    Neut D; van de Belt H; van Horn JR; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Dec; 74(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 14763697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements.
    Schreurs BW; Spierings PT; Huiskes R; Slooff TJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1988 Aug; 59(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 3421077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between porosity and fatigue characteristics of bone cements.
    Dunne NJ; Orr JF; Mushipe MT; Eveleigh RJ
    Biomaterials; 2003 Jan; 24(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 12419624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.
    Muller SD; Green SM; McCaskie AW
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 12553519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do we need to vacuum mix or centrifuge cement?
    Wixson RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):84-90. PubMed ID: 1446459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture and fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement: the effects of mixing method, sterilization treatment, and molecular weight.
    Graham J; Pruitt L; Ries M; Gundiah N
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Dec; 15(8):1028-35. PubMed ID: 11112200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [New PMMA bone cements for vacuum mixing systems].
    Schelling K; Heisel C; Schnürer SM; Mau H; Breusch SJ
    Orthopade; 2002 Jun; 31(6):556-62. PubMed ID: 12149927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A quantitative analysis for determining porosity of pre-compressed and vacuum-mixed bone cement].
    Hahn M; Engelbrecht E; Delling G
    Chirurg; 1990 Jul; 61(7):512-7. PubMed ID: 2394193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
    Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.