These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12168172)

  • 1. Comparative prospective trial of 3 intramedullary plugs in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Visser CP; Eygendaal D; Coene LN; Tavy DL
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):576-8. PubMed ID: 12168172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Occlusion and stability of synthetic femoral canal plugs used in cemented hip arthroplasty.
    Johnson JA; Johnston D; el Hawary R; Tan SR; Wong LA; Gross M
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 7492814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intramedullary plugs in total hip arthroplasty. A comparative study.
    Thomsen NO; Jensen TT; Uhrbrand B; Mossing NB
    J Arthroplasty; 1992; 7 Suppl():415-8. PubMed ID: 1431925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of 3 gelatine-based resorbable cement plugs: a study on 15 synthetic femurs and a prospective randomized study on 103 patients.
    Kroon M; Visser CP; Mootanah R; Brand R
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Dec; 77(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 17260197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic analysis of a bone plug in 275 primary cemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Vanderstappen J; Simon JP; Bellemans J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2012 Jun; 78(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 22822576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation of the cemented acetabular component in hip arthroplasty.
    Flivik G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Apr; 76(316):3-30. PubMed ID: 16042372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technique for a composite femoral intramedullary plug in cemented hip arthroplasty.
    Owens P; Lavernia CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Apr; 14(3):369-71. PubMed ID: 10220192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term results of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component in total hip replacement: a 15- to 21-year follow-up study.
    Rajaratnam SS; Jack C; Tavakkolizadeh A; George MD; Fletcher RJ; Hankins M; Shepperd JA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jan; 90(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 18160495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intramedullary plugs in cemented hip arthroplasty.
    Beim GM; Lavernia C; Convery FR
    J Arthroplasty; 1989; 4(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 2746246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
    Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis and quantitative analysis of bone scintigraphy on thrust plate hip prosthesis.
    Goto T; Yasunaga Y; Takahashi K; Ochi M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jul; 124(6):357-62. PubMed ID: 15108008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro performance of intramedullary cement restrictors in total hip arthroplasty.
    Heisel C; Norman T; Rupp R; Pritsch M; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    J Biomech; 2003 Jun; 36(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 12742451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of surgical management of total HIP replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach.
    Zimmerma S; Hawkes WG; Hudson JI; Magaziner J; Hebel JR; Towheed T; Gardner J; Provenzano G; Kenzora JE
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Mar; 20(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 11918295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Durability of the cemented femoral stem in patients 60 to 80 years old.
    Rasquinha VJ; Ranawat CS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Feb; (419):115-23. PubMed ID: 15021141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femoral canal occlusion in total hip replacement using a resorbable and flexible cement restrictor.
    Bulstra SK; Geesink RG; Bakker D; Bulstra TH; Bouwmeester SJ; van der Linden AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Nov; 78(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 8951002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canal occlusion in cemented primary total hip replacement: autologous compacted bone block compared to a commercially available gelatine plug.
    Agrawal P; Chacko VJ; Divecha H; Board TN
    Hip Int; 2021 May; 31(3):342-347. PubMed ID: 31608700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term survival of the cemented Müller CDH stem: a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
    Salentiny Y; Zwicky L; Ochsner PE; Clauss M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Oct; 138(10):1471-1477. PubMed ID: 30046893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The medium-term results of the cemented Exeter femoral component in patients under 40 years of age.
    de Kam DC; Klarenbeek RL; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Nov; 90(11):1417-21. PubMed ID: 18978258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of collared and collarless femoral components in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.
    Meding JB; Ritter MA; Keating EM; Faris PM; Edmondson K
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Feb; 14(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10065715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.