These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12168252)

  • 1. Comparison of amplitudes of surface macro motor unit potentials recorded from various muscle sites.
    Tsubahara A; Takenaka S
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002; 42(5):313-20. PubMed ID: 12168252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the evaluation of muscle fiber conduction velocity considering waveform properties of an electromyogram in M. biceps brachii during voluntary isometric contraction.
    Mito K; Sakamoto K
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002; 42(3):137-49. PubMed ID: 11977427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of estimated muscle fiber conduction velocity with the normalized peak-averaging technique.
    Nishihara K; Futami T; Hosoda K; Gomi T
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15642657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiological characteristics of motor units in the brachioradialis muscle across fatiguing low-level isometric contractions.
    Calder KM; Stashuk DW; McLean L
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 17113787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Muscle fiber conduction velocity during isometric contraction and the recovery period.
    Sakamoto K; Mito K
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000; 40(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 10812538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distribution of muscle fiber conduction velocity of m. masseter during voluntary isometric contraction.
    Mito K; Sakamoto K
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000; 40(5):275-85. PubMed ID: 10938994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of recording site within the muscle on motor unit potentials.
    Falck B; Stålberg E; Bischoff C
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Dec; 18(12):1385-9. PubMed ID: 7477060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial distribution of surface action potentials generated by individual motor units in the human biceps brachii muscle.
    Rodriguez-Falces J; Negro F; Gonzalez-Izal M; Farina D
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Aug; 23(4):766-77. PubMed ID: 23619102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of a simple method for determining muscle fiber conduction velocity.
    McIntosh KC; Gabriel DA
    Muscle Nerve; 2012 Feb; 45(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 22246883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method using F-waves to measure muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV).
    Metani H; Tsubahara A; Hiraoka T; Aoyagi Y; Tanaka Y
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 45(4):245-53. PubMed ID: 16083149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of changes in intracellular action potential on potentials recorded by single-fiber, macro, and belly-tendon electrodes.
    Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Chakarov VE; Dimitrov AG; Dimitrova NA
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Jun; 37(6):700-12. PubMed ID: 18506714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relation between macro-EMG and muscle Uber conduction velocity.
    Masakado Y; Noda Y; Chino N; Nagata M; Kimura A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995; 35(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 7498075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of experimental and numerical muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) distribution around the end-plate zone and fiber endings.
    Mito K; Kaneko K; Makabe H; Takanokura M; Sakamoto K
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Apr; 12(4):BR115-23. PubMed ID: 16572043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of measurement of muscle fiber conduction velocity using surface EMG.
    Harba MI; Teng LY
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1999; 9(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 10354908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noninvasive estimation of muscle fiber conduction velocity distribution using an electromyographic processing technique.
    Nishihara K; Chiba Y; Moriyama H; Hosoda M; Suzuki Y; Gomi T
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Sep; 15(9):MT113-20. PubMed ID: 19721406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of conventional and decomposition-enhanced spike triggered averaging techniques.
    Lawson VH; Bromberg MB; Stashuk D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):564-8. PubMed ID: 15036051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface detected potentials of normal and reinnervated motor units: a simulation study for muscles consisted of short fibres.
    Dimitrova NA; Disselhorst-Klug C; Trachterna A; Dimitrov GV; Rau G
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 42(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 12056337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography: effect of force on motor unit potentials and motor unit number estimates.
    Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Brown WF; Doherty TJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Mar; 31(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 15627267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of the muscle fibre semi-length under varying joint positions on the basis of non-invasively extracted motor unit action potentials.
    Schulte E; Dimitrova NA; Dimitrov GV; Rau G; Disselhorst-Klug C
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 15763676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.