These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12168654)

  • 1. Fatigue crack growth rate does not depend on mantle thickness: an idealized cemented stem construct under torsional loading.
    Hertzler J; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Jul; 20(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 12168654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased long-term failure risk associated with excessively thin cement mantle in cemented hip arthroplasty: a comparative in vitro study.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Savigni P; Grupp T; Thies O; Viceconti M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):410-21. PubMed ID: 17275149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
    Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem-cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components.
    Manley MT; Stern LS; Gurtowski J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(5):563-75. PubMed ID: 4066729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer simulation on fatigue behavior of cemented hip prostheses: a physiological model.
    Hung JP; Chen JH; Chiang HL; Wu JS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Nov; 76(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15451160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
    Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcement of bone cement around prostheses by pre-coated wire coil: a finite element model study.
    Grosland N; Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1995; 5(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7773144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing.
    Little JP; Gray HA; Murray DW; Beard DJ; Gill HS
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18358388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates.
    Fulkerson E; Koval K; Preston CF; Iesaka K; Kummer FJ; Egol KA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Feb; 20(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 16462560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why would cement porosity reduction be clinically irrelevant, while experimental data show the contrary.
    Janssen D; Stolk J; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 16022978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The treatment of periprosthetic fractures with locking plates: effect of drill and screw type on cement mantles: a biomechanical analysis.
    Kampshoff J; Stoffel KK; Yates PJ; Erhardt JB; Kuster MS
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 May; 130(5):627-32. PubMed ID: 19685062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.